• YouTube pays Trump

    From Joseph Pereira@1:124/5016 to All on Tue Sep 30 08:18:35 2025

    YouTube will pay Trump an amount of 22 million dollars because it had the audacity to block his account in 2021 following the storming of the Capitol. What dreadful sycophants the company's directors are.

    .
    --- SBBSecho 3.30-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Joseph Pereira on Thu Oct 2 07:07:57 2025
    Joseph Pereira wrote to All <=-

    YouTube will pay Trump an amount of 22 million dollars because it had
    the audacity to block his account in 2021 following the storming of the Capitol. What dreadful sycophants the company's directors are.

    Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the presidency. If you are
    a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business
    sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a frivolous
    lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.

    Principles be damned.





    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Kurt Weiske on Thu Oct 2 22:18:23 2025
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Joseph Pereira <=-

    YouTube will pay Trump an amount of 22 million dollars because it had
    the audacity to block his account in 2021 following the storming of the Capitol. What dreadful sycophants the company's directors are.

    Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the presidency. If you are
    a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business
    sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a
    frivolous
    lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.

    Principles be damned.

    Two words:

    Hunter Biden.

    Game. Set. Match.




    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Dan Clough on Fri Oct 3 07:02:15 2025
    Dan Clough wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business
    sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a
    frivolous
    lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.

    Principles be damned.

    Two words:

    Hunter Biden.

    Game. Set. Match.

    Oh, thank you for a good laugh this morning - I needed that.

    Two more words - Jared Kushner.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Kurt Weiske on Fri Oct 3 14:21:55 2025
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business
    sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a
    frivolous
    lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.

    Principles be damned.

    Two words:
    Hunter Biden.
    Game. Set. Match.

    Oh, thank you for a good laugh this morning - I needed that.

    Hey Kurt,

    How smart you are with your context-snipping. Tell me this - why did
    you trim/snip the line that I quoted RIGHT ABOVE where you *did* quote,
    above?

    The line that said: "Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the presidency."

    That's important because that's what my comment about Hunter Biden was
    in reference to. You knew that, and purposely snipped it, to
    (seemingly) remove the connection between "Hunter Biden" and "monetizing
    the Presidency".

    Often, you are VERY lazy with your trimming, leaving entire paragraphs
    of irrelevant crap below your responses, and just sending it. In this
    case, though, you carefully/surgically trimmed things just right, in a
    blatant attempt to skew the context to prevent you from looking like an
    idiot. It failed, as it always does.

    I'd be happy to hear your explanation as to why you snipped my post in
    that manner. You got the balls to answer that?

    Another question: You don't think Hunter Biden contributed to
    "monetizing the Presidency"? Come on, man up and actually answer a
    question, without deception or re-direction.



    ... Your proctologist called - he found your head.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Dan Clough on Sat Oct 4 09:27:32 2025
    Dan Clough wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business
    sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a
    frivolous
    lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.

    Principles be damned.

    Two words:
    Hunter Biden.
    Game. Set. Match.

    Oh, thank you for a good laugh this morning - I needed that.

    Hey Kurt,

    How smart you are with your context-snipping. Tell me this - why did
    you trim/snip the line that I quoted RIGHT ABOVE where you *did* quote, above?

    The line that said: "Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the presidency."

    That's important because that's what my comment about Hunter Biden was
    in reference to. You knew that, and purposely snipped it, to
    (seemingly) remove the connection between "Hunter Biden" and
    "monetizing the Presidency".

    Thank you for including that line. How do Hunter Biden and Jared Kushner compare with regards to benefiting financially from having a president
    in the family?

    Often, you are VERY lazy with your trimming, leaving entire paragraphs
    of irrelevant crap below your responses, and just sending it.

    Yeah, that's a bad habit with my offline reader.

    case, though, you carefully/surgically trimmed things just right, in a blatant attempt to skew the context to prevent you from looking like an idiot. It failed, as it always does.

    Game, Set and Match, Indeed!

    I'd be happy to hear your explanation as to why you snipped my post in that manner. You got the balls to answer that?

    It's all part of a global conspiracy to make you look bad. Just because
    you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you...

    Another question: You don't think Hunter Biden contributed to
    "monetizing the Presidency"? Come on, man up and actually answer a question, without deception or re-direction.

    Man up? Got the balls?

    Freud would have a field day with you.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Kurt Weiske on Sat Oct 4 21:57:16 2025
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    Two words:
    Hunter Biden.
    Game. Set. Match.

    Oh, thank you for a good laugh this morning - I needed that.

    Hey Kurt,

    How smart you are with your context-snipping. Tell me this - why did
    you trim/snip the line that I quoted RIGHT ABOVE where you *did* quote, above?

    The line that said: "Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the presidency."

    That's important because that's what my comment about Hunter Biden was
    in reference to. You knew that, and purposely snipped it, to
    (seemingly) remove the connection between "Hunter Biden" and
    "monetizing the Presidency".

    Thank you for including that line. How do Hunter Biden and Jared
    Kushner compare with regards to benefiting financially from having a president in the family?

    I don't know the answer to that question, and neither do you.

    You didn't bother to answer my question as to *WHY* you intentionally
    snipped the context the way you did. You just did your standard
    diversion tactic of asking an unrelated question. Very predictable.

    Often, you are VERY lazy with your trimming, leaving entire paragraphs
    of irrelevant crap below your responses, and just sending it.

    Yeah, that's a bad habit with my offline reader.

    Bullshit. I use the same reader. It's a bad habit (called laziness) on *YOUR* part, not the offline reader.

    I'd be happy to hear your explanation as to why you snipped my post in that manner. You got the balls to answer that?

    It's all part of a global conspiracy to make you look bad. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you...

    Again, you dodge the question, and attempt to divert with regurgitated
    old, tired, catch-phrases that you think make you seem wise.

    Another question: You don't think Hunter Biden contributed to
    "monetizing the Presidency"? Come on, man up and actually answer a question, without deception or re-direction.

    And again..... another one that you don't answer.



    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)