• Republican strategy

    From Joseph Pereira@1:124/5016 to All on Wed Jul 30 06:04:31 2025

    One of the reasons Republicans give for not contradicting Trump is that they are literally waiting for him to die and then want to take over his base... They live in a dream world. In a cult, you don't just easily "take over" the previous leader's base... You have to bring your own personality to the table.

    .
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)
  • From IB Joe@1:342/200 to Joseph Pereira on Wed Jul 30 06:25:29 2025
    On 30 Jul 2025, Joseph Pereira said the following...


    One of the reasons Republicans give for not contradicting Trump is that they are literally waiting for him to die and then want to take over his base... They live in a dream world. In a cult, you don't just easily
    "take over" the previous leader's base... You have to bring your own personality to the table.


    This is not true.

    Daddy Trump puts America 1ST
    Daddy Trump is bringing home TRILLIONS in investment opportunities for the US Daddy Trump is winning with tread deals and bringing home manufacturing.
    Daddy Trump is draining the swamp and getting rid of wasteful spending.
    Daddy Trump did more in a few months than any other president.

    Obama once said that trump couldn't bring home manufacturing.... How?? With a magic wand?? Daddy Trump's magic is that he loves hos country and he puts America first... and his Super Model wife doesn't have a penis.

    I'm for Trump 2028... The De,mocrats showed a way to have a president with a 3rd term... Like Barry did with Biden. I just argue that JD working as an apprentice over the next few years will be fine... That and Marco as his VP will be wonderful.

    The Democrat party is dead... The old guard Republican party... dead as well. The Populous American First republican Party is alive!!!


    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)


    Funny how the BBS name is like your logic... End Of The Line...


    BTW, change your name ... its embarrassing other Joes...

    IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)
    AKA Joe Schweier
    SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53
    -=JoesBBS.com=-

    ... How is it possible to have a civil war?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)
  • From Ne Va@1:105/420 to Joseph Pereira on Thu Jul 31 06:15:20 2025
    One of the reasons Republicans give for not contradicting Trump is that they are literally waiting for him to die and then want to take over his base...
    The name of the game in a multi racial multi ethnic democracy is patronage. Votes are purchased by gifts from the public purse.

    and right about now someone is going to bitch to me about how things are not supposed to be this way, or we are this type of system not that type of system. I don't care, learn the difference between is and aught.

    While Trump delivers very little, almost zero, he has delivered more to the white working man in this country than any other GOP candidate in lifetimes. In many respects the GOP is worse than the dems because they sell hope and when it comes time to deliver they falter. This is in no large part because they are the designated losers of the system. They are the outer party to the dems inner party.

    When Trump dies anyone can take his crown by doing one simple thing, providing patronage. The dems deliver patronage by the boatload to their people. Good jobs in the state or universities and nearly unlimited funding for their pet projects through organizations like USAID.

    Trumps defunding of USAID was great but he needs to do more and fund right wing programs.

    If the GOP can not find it within themselves to own who their voters are, for the most part white men, and provide them with the things they want. Trumps base will tune out and depending on age radicalize more.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbS>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (1:105/420)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Ne Va on Thu Jul 31 07:49:37 2025
    Ne Va wrote to Joseph Pereira <=-

    While Trump delivers very little, almost zero, he has delivered more to the white working man in this country than any other GOP candidate in lifetimes.

    Tax cuts for the wealthy? Tax increases on the middle/lower classes?
    Elimination of social programs that benefit those people? Additional
    taxes hidden as tariffs that get passed on to the consumer?

    When Trump dies anyone can take his crown by doing one simple thing, providing patronage. The dems deliver patronage by the boatload to
    their people. Good jobs in the state or universities and nearly
    unlimited funding for their pet projects through organizations like
    USAID.

    Trumps defunding of USAID was great but he needs to do more and fund
    right wing programs.

    Defunding USAID hurts people around the world, tarnishes our view as
    leader of the free world and gives China an opening on the world
    stage.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Don Vally@1:135/363 to KURT WEISKE on Fri Aug 1 11:57:54 2025
    Quoting Kurt Weiske to Ne Va <=-

    Ne Va wrote to Joseph Pereira <=-

    Trumps defunding of USAID was great but he needs to do more and fund
    right wing programs.

    Defunding USAID hurts people around the world, tarnishes our view as leader of the free world and gives China an opening on the world
    stage.

    Yeah, we really need to fund the transgender operations of LGBTQIA+
    (XZTEDBS) in Africa and the mental health issues that go with it
    once they get completed and the he/she/it/they have realized they
    made a mistake.

    Give me a break Kurtskie...






    ... Tagline explodes, destroys BBS. Film at 11!

    ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
    --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
    * Origin: CJ's Place, Orange City FL > cjsplace.thruhere.net (1:135/363)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Don Vally on Mon Aug 4 07:34:38 2025
    Don Vally wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

    Yeah, we really need to fund the transgender operations of LGBTQIA+
    (XZTEDBS) in Africa and the mental health issues that go with it
    once they get completed and the he/she/it/they have realized they
    made a mistake.

    What programmes does USAID fund?

    USAID funds more than 6,000 global programmes in health, education,
    climate change, food security, humanitarian assistance, governance and democracy.

    Health

    USAID supports PEPFAR for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, mainly in
    Africa. It also funds initiatives against malaria, tuberculosis and
    severe malnutrition. It also supports vaccine development and women's reproductive health.

    Democracy and Governance

    Some 38% of USAID's budget promotes democracy and human rights, with
    more than $14 billion allocated in 2023, focusing on Ukraine. Projects strengthen media, civil society and anti-corruption efforts.

    Humanitarian Assistance

    In 2023, 22% of funds addressed humanitarian crises in countries like
    Sudan and Ukraine, providing food, water, shelter and long-term
    nutrition services.

    Climate Change and Food Security

    USAID collaborates to develop climate solutions, improve land
    management, and invest in renewable energy. In Colombia, it enhances
    climate resilience and promotes climate-smart agriculture.

    Education

    USAID supports teacher training, school management and scholarships,
    with initiatives to increase girls' school enrolment in countries like Mozambique and Nepal.

    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Kurt Weiske on Tue Aug 5 00:57:10 2025
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Don Vally <=-

    Yeah, we really need to fund the transgender operations of LGBTQIA+
    (XZTEDBS) in Africa and the mental health issues that go with it
    once they get completed and the he/she/it/they have realized they
    made a mistake.

    What programmes does USAID fund?

    USAID funds more than 6,000 global programmes in health,
    education, climate change, food security, humanitarian
    assistance, governance and democracy.

    Health

    USAID supports PEPFAR for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment,
    mainly in Africa. It also funds initiatives against malaria,
    tuberculosis and severe malnutrition. It also supports vaccine
    development and women's reproductive health.

    Democracy and Governance

    Some 38% of USAID's budget promotes democracy and human rights,
    with more than $14 billion allocated in 2023, focusing on
    Ukraine. Projects strengthen media, civil society and
    anti-corruption efforts.

    Humanitarian Assistance

    In 2023, 22% of funds addressed humanitarian crises in countries
    like Sudan and Ukraine, providing food, water, shelter and
    long-term nutrition services.

    Climate Change and Food Security

    USAID collaborates to develop climate solutions, improve land
    management, and invest in renewable energy. In Colombia, it
    enhances climate resilience and promotes climate-smart
    agriculture.

    Education

    USAID supports teacher training, school management and
    scholarships, with initiatives to increase girls' school
    enrolment in countries like Mozambique and Nepal.

    Yeah... great talking points there, likely harvested right off the DNC manifesto, right?

    Here's a valid question (which I admit to not knowing the answer to): You cited a few percentages above there. What percentage of their funding went to "overhead"...? Yeah, that vague category that actually means "lines the pockets of corrupt politicians" and "other personnel"...? Do you know?

    The truth is that it was a money-laundering operation, almost entirely to the benefit of Democrats and the Leftist agenda. AKA Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. The Libs are the only ones upset because they were the only ones "reaping the rewards".



    ... Liberalism is the "flesh eating bacteria" of society.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Dan Clough on Tue Aug 5 08:58:32 2025
    Dan Clough wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Yeah... great talking points there, likely harvested right off the DNC manifesto, right?

    "Manifesto?"

    Here's a valid question (which I admit to not knowing the answer to):
    You cited a few percentages above there. What percentage of their
    funding went to "overhead"...? Yeah, that vague category that actually means "lines the pockets of corrupt politicians" and "other
    personnel"...? Do you know?

    6.6% administrative overhead for USAID. Any NGO is going to have some
    level of overhead, it's the cost of providing services.


    The truth is that it was a money-laundering operation, almost entirely
    to the benefit of Democrats and the Leftist agenda. AKA Waste, Fraud,
    and Abuse. The Libs are the only ones upset because they were the only ones "reaping the rewards".

    The people that, you know, didn't starve or die of communicable
    diseases because of the efforts of USAID certainly benefitted.

    As for the libs being upset because they were the only ones "reaping
    the rewards", that's painting with an awfully wide brush. I'm upset
    because USAID is a great way to help people in need while extending
    influence into developing nations. China is quickly taking up the
    slack. Is that in the US' best interests?




    ... Liberalism is the "flesh eating bacteria" of society.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL *
    (1:135/115)

    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Kurt Weiske on Fri Aug 8 22:48:55 2025
    Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    Yeah... great talking points there, likely harvested right off the DNC manifesto, right?

    "Manifesto?"

    Probably not the right choice of word. How about from the party's platform planks? Maybe the TV ads? The mainstream media's index-card list of random anti-GOP subjects?

    Here's a valid question (which I admit to not knowing the answer to):
    You cited a few percentages above there. What percentage of their
    funding went to "overhead"...? Yeah, that vague category that actually means "lines the pockets of corrupt politicians" and "other
    personnel"...? Do you know?

    6.6% administrative overhead for USAID. Any NGO is going to have
    some level of overhead, it's the cost of providing services.

    Sure, a little overhead is expected. I highly doubt that figure is accurate, and don't have the time needed to check it. VERY unlikely that it's that low, when you get down into the multilevel count of "middlemen" who all need their cut. I'd bet it's closer to 50% when the trickle-down is finished.

    The truth is that it was a money-laundering operation, almost entirely
    to the benefit of Democrats and the Leftist agenda. AKA Waste, Fraud,
    and Abuse. The Libs are the only ones upset because they were the only ones "reaping the rewards".

    The people that, you know, didn't starve or die of communicable
    diseases because of the efforts of USAID certainly benefitted.

    Probably. Were these beneficiaries Americans? If not, why would we spend
    US taxpayer money on them before we took care of those starving or dying of communicable diseases right here in our own country? Or those Americans who are homeless, or veterans killing themselves because of PTSD related issues?

    My whole point here is that our tax dollars should be spent on AMERICANS.

    As for the libs being upset because they were the only ones
    "reaping the rewards", that's painting with an awfully wide brush. I'm upset because USAID is a great way to help people in need while

    I've got nothing against helping people in need. But those people should be AMERICANS. When all of them are taken care of, if there's any money left
    over, then help others. OUR PEOPLE FIRST.

    extending influence into developing nations. China is quickly taking up the slack. Is that in the US' best interests?

    That's happening regardless of what USAID may have done. Zero effect on that by closing down USAID.

    To summarize all of this above stuff into one question:

    Can you tell my EVEN ONE reason that we should spend American money on other countries, when there are MILLIONS of AMERICANS who need assistance first?

    It's really that simple in my opinion.



    ... Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)