• RE: Thoughts please

    From Earl Croasmun@1:124/311 to Bob Breed on Tue Aug 24 12:58:50 2010
    The short answer would be: little to none.

    After WW II, active duty military dropped from over 12 million to under 1.5 million in 1950. (To Truman's great regret in 1950, as we now know.) Some
    got jobs. Some were unemployed. Some were disabled. And some went to
    school on the GI Bill before entering the work force.

    But one big difference is that Iraq and Afghanistan were fought without a
    crash increase in numbers. In fact, through Bush I to Clinton to Bush II,
    the size of the military was dropping. Under Bush II it flattened out and stayed in the region of 1.4 million, but did not jump up the way it did for Viet Nam. So the end of the fighting will not lead to any great mustering
    out. And I haven't seen any strong move by Obama to slash the overall size
    of the military, although he might consider it next year as he tries to cut spending going into his reelection try.


    Just thinking about now that the Iraq thing is winding down and we're
    'bringing
    the boys home,' what kind of impact will that have on unemployement?

    I found this bit of history on the web:

    Here's a look at the U.S. unemployment rate for selected years from 1920 to 2008.
    Year Rate
    1920 5.2 %
    1928 4.2
    1930 8.7
    1932 23.6
    1934 21.7
    1936 16.9
    1938 19.0
    1940 14.6
    1942 4.7%
    1944 1.2
    1946 3.9
    1948 3.8
    1950 5.3
    1952 3.0
    1954 5.5
    1956 4.1
    1958 6.8%
    1960 5.5
    1962 5.5
    1964 5.2
    1966 3.8
    1968 3.6
    1970 4.9
    1972 5.6
    1974 5.6%
    1976 7.7
    19781 6.1
    1980 7.1
    1982 9.7
    1984 7.5
    19861 7.0
    1987 6.2
    1988 5.5
    1989 5.3
    19901 5.6%
    1991 6.8
    1992 7.5
    1993 6.9
    19941 6.1
    1995 5.6
    1996 5.4
    19971 4.9
    19981 4.5
    19991 4.2
    20001 4.0
    2001 4.7
    2002 5.8
    20031 6.0%
    20041 5.5
    20051 5.1
    2006 4.6
    2007 4.6
    2008 5.8


    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
    * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)
  • From Jeff Binkley@1:226/600 to Earl Croasmun on Tue Aug 24 15:12:00 2010


    ID: PX/Win v3.0pr5a PX96-0746M2
    SGID: 1:124/311 5fc0727b
    ZUTC: -0500
    The short answer would be: little to none.

    After WW II, active duty military dropped from over 12 million to
    under 1.5 million in 1950. (To Truman's great regret in 1950, as we
    now know.) Some got jobs. Some were unemployed. Some were
    disabled. And some went to school on the GI Bill before entering the EC>work force.

    But one big difference is that Iraq and Afghanistan were fought
    without a crash increase in numbers. In fact, through Bush I to
    Clinton to Bush II, the size of the military was dropping. Under
    Bush II it flattened out and stayed in the region of 1.4 million, but
    did not jump up the way it did for Viet Nam. So the end of the
    fighting will not lead to any great mustering out. And I haven't
    seen any strong move by Obama to slash the overall size of the
    military, although he might consider it next year as he tries to cut EC>spending going into his reelection try.


    Maybe this is the answer ?

    http://www.wvec.com/news/local/US-Second-Fleet-in-jeopardy-as-DoD-trims- budget-101368049.html




    Jeff

    --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
    * Origin: (1:226/600)