Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 04:13:59 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,929 |
| Messages: | 98,354 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
I'm just guessing.
"John Massey -> BOB KLAHN" <1:123/789.0> wrote in news:9542$ALL-POLITICS@JamNNTPd:
What has any of that got to do with the fact that an
American judge used sharia law as a reason when allowing a
rapist and a wife mutilator to go free?
Actually, the judge never mentioned Sharia. Probably doesn't
know any more about it than you do.
Bob your absolutely right, the judge, never mention sharia law,
however in his opinion it is clear that he was using tenants of sharia
law as justification for not singing a restraining order.
"This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this
defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to
sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he
was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire
to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was
consistent with his practices and it was something that was not
prohibited."
I think even you would have a hard time making a case for the judge's
refusal to sign the restraining order based on American jurisprudence.
Point 1: The judge in this case was over-ruled.
Point 2: I haven't found anything *CLOSE* to this ruling.
Point 3: It has nothing to do with my original point, namely that professional Muslim-haters like Pam Geller, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are creating religious bigotry to gain political and financial gain.
And they whip up their followers into near-homicidal rages.
Show that any of those you mentioned hate Muslims. Show that any of
those you mentioned purposely "whip up [anyone] into near-homicidal
rages." Prove that their rhetoric incites violence.
Point 3: It has nothing to do with my original point, namely thatBeck
professional Muslim-haters like Pam Geller, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn
are creating religious bigotry to gain political and financial gain.
And they whip up their followers into near-homicidal rages.
Show that any of those you mentioned hate Muslims. Show that any of
those you mentioned purposely "whip up [anyone] into near-homicidal
rages." Prove that their rhetoric incites violence.
The scumbag mentioned Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin. Otto's braindead.
His heros include the racist Harry Reid (yes, I know he's a fellow
Mormon) who cannot imagine an Hispanic person being a Republican.
"Ross Cassell -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/456> wrote in news:9550$ALL-POLITICS@JamNNTPd:
The New York City landmarks commission decided this week to act
in the RS> interest of New Yorkers rather than out-of-state
conservative pundits RS> and voted to clear the way for the
construction of an Islamic center RS> in lower Manhattan, a few
blocks from the site where the World Trade RS> that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Not "a lot of people."
A few bigots.
Like "American Family Association's" Brian Fischer, who wants to ban
*ALL* mosques and Muslim buildings in the US. Period.
You see, all Muslims are alike, right? (sarcasm off)
If Al Queda had hit your town and 10 years later, Muslims wanted to
build a Mosque on or near the site, I would have a problem with that
as well.
If this is a group that fervently opposes radicals like Al-Qaeda, I see nothing wrong with it. And the Constitution says there is no damn reason to stop them from building the Cordoba Community Center.
But in your case, along with Newt and Palin, the terroists *HAVE* won. They wanted to sow unreasonable fear and hatred. They succeeded in your case.
Of course if they were wanting to build a Christian Church on the site
that this mosque is supposed to go, you would be raising hell.
I wouldn't have cared one way or the other. Why DIDN'T any Christian
group buy that damaged building?
Dont even talk to me about out of state people mucking in the business
of other states, considering a Wisconsin organization is having
convulsions on how a hick town to my south is openning its council
meetings.
You mean those Jesus freaks in that teeny town, giving the Supreme Court the bird and claiming their faith is so weak it needs a town government
to prop it up?
Hello Ed!
11 Aug 10 21:27, you wrote to Stan Hardegree:
His heros include the racist Harry Reid (yes, I know he's a fellow
Mormon) who cannot imagine an Hispanic person being a Republican.
If Reid is a Mormon, wouldnt that make him in Sauers eyes, a cultist?
Point 3: It has nothing to do with my original point, namelythat RS> professional Muslim-haters like Pam Geller, Rush Limbaugh
and Glenn
Beck
are creating religious bigotry to gain political and financialgain. RS> And they whip up their followers into near-homicidal
rages.
Show that any of those you mentioned hate Muslims. Show that anyof EH> those you mentioned purposely "whip up [anyone] into
near-homicidal EH> rages." Prove that their rhetoric incites violence.
The scumbag mentioned Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin. Otto's
braindead.
...
doing but I am equally concerned that folks don't abhor
actions taken by radical Muslims or don't get as wound up
I am concerned that people aren't worried about radical
Christians.
when someone burns a Bible. It seems like we have our thinking wrong.
Yeah, I am not too concerned with what religious text anyone
burns, as long as he pays for it and it doesn't have particular BK>historical significance.
However, I am concerned at those who burn anything for the
purpose of appealing to bigotry and hate.
act RC>> in the RS> interest of New Yorkers rather than out-of-stateThe New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
conservative pundits RS> and voted to clear the way for the
construction of an Islamic center RS> in lower Manhattan, a few
blocks from the site where the World Trade RS> that this site
of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Not "a lot of people."
A few bigots.
The majority of America is against the Mosque. Are the majority of EH>America "a few bigots?"
Like "American Family Association's" Brian Fischer, who wants to
ban *ALL* mosques and Muslim buildings in the US. Period.
You point to one small group and then try to paint anyone and
everyone with the same brush.
"Stan Hardegree -> Ed Hulett" <1:123/789.0> wrote in news:15009$POL_DISORDER@JamNNTPd:
Point 3: It has nothing to do with my original point, namely
that RS> professional Muslim-haters like Pam Geller, Rush Limbaugh
and Glenn
Beck
are creating religious bigotry to gain political and financial
gain. RS> And they whip up their followers into near-homicidal
rages.
Show that any of those you mentioned hate Muslims. Show that any
of EH> those you mentioned purposely "whip up [anyone] into
near-homicidal EH> rages." Prove that their rhetoric incites violence.
The scumbag mentioned Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin. Otto's
braindead.
You're slime.
http://www.sheboyganpress.com/article/20100808/SHE010301/8080395/-1/obits
The New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
act RC>> in the RS> interest of New Yorkers rather than out-of-state
conservative pundits RS> and voted to clear the way for the
construction of an Islamic center RS> in lower Manhattan, a few
blocks from the site where the World Trade RS> that this site
of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Not "a lot of people."
A few bigots.
The majority of America is against the Mosque. Are the majority of
America "a few bigots?"
Like "American Family Association's" Brian Fischer, who wants to
ban *ALL* mosques and Muslim buildings in the US. Period.
You point to one small group and then try to paint anyone and
everyone with the same brush.
The left and its lemming followers are on the wrong side of the
mainstream public on almost every major issue today. This will be
evident in November.
No, you are slime. You celebrated the death of a victim of 9-11 simply because she had the audacity to write a book showing one of your
heroes in a bad light.
http://www.sheboyganpress.com/article/20100808/SHE010301/8080395/-1/o
bits
Sorry to hear of your loss, but Stan was referring to you, Otto Ross Sauer.
The left and its lemming followers are on the wrong side of thebe JB> evident in November.
mainstream public on almost every major issue today. This will
Indeed it will. There is a good possibility that the Republicans will
also take the Senate.
out-of-state RC>>>> conservative pundits RS> and voted to clear theThe New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
act RC>> in the RS> interest of New Yorkers rather than
way for the construction of an Islamic center RS> in lower
Manhattan, a few blocks from the site where the World Trade
that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Not "a lot of people."
A few bigots.
The majority of America is against the Mosque. Are the majority
of America "a few bigots?"
Like "American Family Association's" Brian Fischer, who wants
to ban *ALL* mosques and Muslim buildings in the US. Period.
You point to one small group and then try to paint anyone and
everyone with the same brush.
The left and its lemming followers are on the wrong side of the mainstream public on almost every major issue today. This will
be evident in November.
Indeed it will. There is a good possibility that the Republicans will EH>also take the Senate.
"Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/789.0> wrote in news:15018$POL_DISORDER@JamNNTPd:
No, you are slime. You celebrated the death of a victim of 9-11 simply
because she had the audacity to write a book showing one of your
heroes in a bad light.
No, she was a liar, a hyper-partisan liar who embraced any and every wild rumor or innuendo about Bill Clinton.
http://www.sheboyganpress.com/article/20100808/SHE010301/8080395/-1/o
bits
Sorry to hear of your loss, but Stan was referring to you, Otto Ross
Sauer.
Except I'm not Otto. Technically yes, but to everyone who knows our family my Dad was Otto, I'm Ross.
Contiuing to call me Otto is 4th-grade playground reject "nanny nanny poo poo" attempts at insult.
And Stan could hardly claim "I didn't know."
Since Monday of last week, I posted several threads at DU, detailing my Dad's diagnosis of cancer, when we found out it was terminal, when he went into a coma and when he died.
Stan is fond of searching DU for threads I start, hence his referencing my love of cats, enjoyment of videogames, etc.
"Ed Hulett -> Jeff Binkley" <1:123/789.0> wrote in news:15019$POL_DISORDER@JamNNTPd:say,
The left and its lemming followers are on the wrong side of the
mainstream public on almost every major issue today. This will
be JB> evident in November.
Indeed it will. There is a good possibility that the Republicans will
also take the Senate.
Can I quote you after November, when as other (no Faux "news") pundits
the democrats increase their majority?
Don't count on the Tea Party.
It's burned out.
The New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
out-of-state RC>>>> conservative pundits RS> and voted to clear theact RC>> in the RS> interest of New Yorkers rather than
way for the construction of an Islamic center RS> in lower
Manhattan, a few blocks from the site where the World Trade
that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Not "a lot of people."
A few bigots.
The majority of America is against the Mosque. Are the majority
of America "a few bigots?"
Like "American Family Association's" Brian Fischer, who wants
to ban *ALL* mosques and Muslim buildings in the US. Period.
You point to one small group and then try to paint anyone and
everyone with the same brush.
The left and its lemming followers are on the wrong side of the
mainstream public on almost every major issue today. This will
be evident in November.
Indeed it will. There is a good possibility that the Republicans will
also take the Senate.
Perhaps. Just realize the game here may be that the Dems are happy with the gains they have made on their social/socialist agenda and now want
the republcians to take over so that they can blame them for the mess
the next two years. THus helping BO get re-elected. Don't put anything past these folks on the left. They cannot be trusted and must be
defeated, each and every day.
No, you are slime. You celebrated the death of a victim of 9-11
simply because she had the audacity to write a book showing one
of your heroes in a bad light.
No, she was a liar, a hyper-partisan liar who embraced any and every
wild rumor or innuendo about Bill Clinton.
Stan is fond of searching DU for threads I start, hence his
referencing my love of cats, enjoyment of videogames, etc.
Can I quote you after November, when as other (no Faux "news") pundits say, the democrats increase their majority?
act BK> in the RS>> interest of New Yorkers rather thanThe New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
out-of-state conservative pundits RS>> and voted to clear the
way for the construction of an Islamic center RS>> in lower
Manhattan, a few blocks from the site where the World Trade
that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Which is not relevant to constitutional rights.
The US is a country with majority Christian as a faith.
We also get horror stories almost on a daily basis in our media, of
atrocities caused by radical Muslims.
So it's only natural, when polled, people are going to answer "no" to
a question "Should a mosque be allowed to be built at Ground Zero?"
Rephrase the question accurately, "Should a moderate Muslim
organization be allowed to build a community center 2 blocks from
Ground Zero?"
That will get a more positive result for the poll.
But people are also susceptible to demagoguery.
Let us know when you have those poll results and how you will gauge moderate Mulsims. Until then, this is conjecture and wishful thinking.
Since Monday of last week, I posted several threads at DU, detailing my RS>Dad's diagnosis of cancer, when we found out it was terminal, when he went RS>into a coma and when he died.
Stan is fond of searching DU for threads I start, hence his referencing my RS>love of cats, enjoyment of videogames, etc.
act BK> in the RS>> interest of New Yorkers rather thanThe New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
out-of-state conservative pundits RS>> and voted to clear the
way for the construction of an Islamic center RS>> in lower
Manhattan, a few blocks from the site where the World Trade
that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Which is not relevant to constitutional rights.
The US is a country with majority Christian as a faith.
We also get horror stories almost on a daily basis in our
media, of atrocities caused by radical Muslims.
So it's only natural, when polled, people are going to answer
"no" to a question "Should a mosque be allowed to be built at
Ground Zero?"
Rephrase the question accurately, "Should a moderate Muslim
organization be allowed to build a community center 2 blocks
from Ground Zero?"
That will get a more positive result for the poll.
But people are also susceptible to demagoguery.
Let us know when you have those poll results and how you will
gauge moderate Mulsims. Until then, this is conjecture and
wishful thinking.
What Otto Ar-Kay wants everyone to believe is that the polls so far
have used the words "should be allowed." In fact, the polls I have
seen have asked if Imam Rauf and his Cordoba Project has the right to EH>build there and a large majority agrees they do while an equal
majority then answer that Rauf should build it elsewhere if he truly EH>wants to build bridges between cultures.
Insisting that it's merely a community center ignores the fact that a EH>mosque is a major part of the building.
What is evident about Otto Ar-Kay and his fellow travelers' support
for the Cordoba project Park 51 mosque is that Obama and many pundits
on the left have put their support behind it. They make noise about
how anyone who opposes Rauf's decision to build there must be a
religious bigot or pandering to religious bigots until several
prominent Democrats have voiced their opposition.
What I find hilariously hypocritical is that many, if not most of
those now supporting the mosque being built at Park 51 oppose Glenn EH>Beck's 8-28 "Restoring Honor" rally at the Lincoln memorial. While
Obama administration members will be speaking at the anti-Beck rally
put together by Al Sharpton, Martin Luther King's niece will be
speaking at Beck's rally.
act BK> in the RS>> interest of New Yorkers rather thanThe New York City landmarks commission decided this week to
out-of-state conservative pundits RS>> and voted to clear the
way for the construction of an Islamic center RS>> in lower
Manhattan, a few blocks from the site where the World Trade
that this site of A
It is unacceptable to alot of people...
Which is not relevant to constitutional rights.
The US is a country with majority Christian as a faith.
We also get horror stories almost on a daily basis in our
media, of atrocities caused by radical Muslims.
So it's only natural, when polled, people are going to answer
"no" to a question "Should a mosque be allowed to be built at
Ground Zero?"
Rephrase the question accurately, "Should a moderate Muslim
organization be allowed to build a community center 2 blocks
from Ground Zero?"
That will get a more positive result for the poll.
But people are also susceptible to demagoguery.
Let us know when you have those poll results and how you will
gauge moderate Mulsims. Until then, this is conjecture and
wishful thinking.
What Otto Ar-Kay wants everyone to believe is that the polls so far
have used the words "should be allowed." In fact, the polls I have
seen have asked if Imam Rauf and his Cordoba Project has the right to
build there and a large majority agrees they do while an equal
majority then answer that Rauf should build it elsewhere if he truly
wants to build bridges between cultures.
Insisting that it's merely a community center ignores the fact that a
mosque is a major part of the building.
What is evident about Otto Ar-Kay and his fellow travelers' support
for the Cordoba project Park 51 mosque is that Obama and many pundits
on the left have put their support behind it. They make noise about
how anyone who opposes Rauf's decision to build there must be a
religious bigot or pandering to religious bigots until several
prominent Democrats have voiced their opposition.
What I find hilariously hypocritical is that many, if not most of
those now supporting the mosque being built at Park 51 oppose Glenn
Beck's 8-28 "Restoring Honor" rally at the Lincoln memorial. While
Obama administration members will be speaking at the anti-Beck rally
put together by Al Sharpton, Martin Luther King's niece will be
speaking at Beck's rally.
These people hate this country but just can't bring themselves to admit it.