Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 06:14:29 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,929 |
| Messages: | 98,371 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
EARL CROASMUN wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-
Disagree with the Citizens United ruling handed down by the Supreme court allowing unlimited political campaign donations by corporations
subverting your rights as a U.S. citizen?
The first amendment to the United States Constitution agrees with the decision in Citizens United. You posted a site for those who do not
like free speech. How about one for those who DO like free speech?
The first amendment to the United States Constitution agrees with the decision in Citizens United. You posted a site for those who do not like free speech. How about one for those who DO like free speech?
How many votes do you think a large corporation like Exxon - Mobil
is entitled to?
If they've a greater right than that of an average citizen to donate
to a political candidate, and they do, the that's elevating corporations
far above those rights granted to U.S. citizens.
Thus corporations can thus easily move the U.S. towards the very definition of a fascist state as defined by Benito Mussolini.
Your average U.S. citizen is strictly limited in what they can donate,
the corporations are NOT.
EARL CROASMUN wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-
The first amendment to the United States Constitution agrees with the decision in Citizens United. You posted a site for those who do not like free speech. How about one for those who DO like free speech?
How many votes do you think a large corporation like Exxon - Mobil
is entitled to?
Corporations don't vote in elections for governmental office. Most
people already knew that, but I point it out just in case.
If they've a greater right than that of an average citizen to donate
to a political candidate, and they do, the that's elevating corporations far above those rights granted to U.S. citizens.
The case had nothing to do with donating money to a candidate, and it
gave no "greater" rights to corporations than individuals. Your lack
of understanding the basics of the case helps to explain your opinion
of it.
Thus corporations can thus easily move the U.S. towards the very definition of a fascist state as defined by Benito Mussolini.
Ha ha ha! Sauer and Klahn tried that a while back, and then dropped it after they displayed that they don't have a clue as to what "fascist" means. Go ahead and take your turn. Try to explain why Citizens
United can lead to a centralized government having more power OVER privately-held companies!
Your average U.S. citizen is strictly limited in what they can donate,
the corporations are NOT.
Really? The United States Supreme Court and the US Code disagree with you, but please, please elaborate!!!
EARL CROASMUN wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-
theThe first amendment to the United States Constitution agrees with
decision in Citizens United. You posted a site for those who do not
like free speech. How about one for those who DO like free speech?
How many votes do you think a large corporation like Exxon - Mobil
is entitled to?
Corporations don't vote in elections for governmental office. Most
people already knew that, but I point it out just in case.
If they've a greater right than that of an average citizen to donate
to a political candidate, and they do, the that's elevating corporations
far above those rights granted to U.S. citizens.
The case had nothing to do with donating money to a candidate, and it
gave no "greater" rights to corporations than individuals. Your lack
of understanding the basics of the case helps to explain your opinion
of it.
Thus corporations can thus easily move the U.S. towards the verydefinition
of a fascist state as defined by Benito Mussolini.
Ha ha ha! Sauer and Klahn tried that a while back, and then dropped it
after they displayed that they don't have a clue as to what "fascist"
means. Go ahead and take your turn. Try to explain why Citizens
United can lead to a centralized government having more power OVER
privately-held companies!
Your average U.S. citizen is strictly limited in what they can donate,
the corporations are NOT.
Really? The United States Supreme Court and the US Code disagree with
you, but please, please elaborate!!!
So snap out that checkbook and write a matching donation equal to Exxon - Mobil's
donation.
Be a true American and DO IT TODAY!!!
Test deleted unread.
Roll over
How many votes do you think a large corporation like Exxon - Mobil
is entitled to?
Corporations don't vote in elections for governmental office. Most people already knew that, but I point it out just in case.
If they've a greater right than that of an average citizen to donate
to a political candidate, and they do, the that's elevating corporations far above those rights granted to U.S. citizens.
The case had nothing to do with donating money to a candidate, and it gave no "greater" rights to corporations than individuals. Your lack of understanding the basics of the case helps to explain your opinion of it.
definitionThus corporations can thus easily move the U.S. towards the very
of a fascist state as defined by Benito Mussolini.
Ha ha ha! Sauer and Klahn tried that a while back, and then dropped it after they displayed that they don't have a clue as to what "fascist" means. Go ahead and take your turn. Try to explain why Citizens United can lead to a centralized government having more power OVER privately-held companies!
Your average U.S. citizen is strictly limited in what they can donate, the corporations are NOT.
Really? The United States Supreme Court and the US Code disagree
with you, but please, please elaborate!!!
So snap out that checkbook and write a matching donation equal to Exxon - Mobil's donation.
ED HULETT wrote to WAYNE CHIRNSIDE <=-
On 05/01/2010 03:09 PM, WAYNE CHIRNSIDE -> ED HULETT wrote:
Test deleted unread.
Roll over
Way to run away from the truth, idiot.
The first amendment to the United States Constitution agrees with the ~>> EC> decision in Citizens United. You posted a site for those who do not ~>> EC> like free speech. How about one for those who DO like free speech?
How many votes do you think a large corporation like Exxon - Mobil
is entitled to?
Corporations don't vote in elections for governmental
office. Most people already knew that, but I point it out
just in case.
Thus corporations can thus easily move the U.S. towards the very definition ~>> of a fascist state as defined by Benito Mussolini.
Ha ha ha! Sauer and Klahn tried that a while back, and
then dropped it after they displayed that they don't have a
clue as to what "fascist" means. Go ahead and take your
turn. Try to explain why Citizens United can lead to a
centralized government having more power OVER
privately-held companies!
Be a true American and DO IT TODAY!!!
Please educate yourself on the case. It was about paid
advertisement supporting or opposing a candidate. Citizens
United made a short documentary about Hillary Clinton and
were barred from showing it. They sued. It went all the way
to the Supreme Court and the SC found in CU's favor.