Mitch the Bitch and his cheerleaders are really throwing

tantrums.

$20 against the Clinton jail fund that nobody else here, but
you, knows what this means.

You mean Sludge didn't tell you what to think on this?

Again, I have no idea what you are referencing. Is this
something that Rachel programmed you to say ?

Mitch McConnell has earned the moniker "Mitch the Bitch" since he has RS>this habit of pushing his agenda of "screw Obama no matter who it
hurts."

Really ? Which of your leftwing brethren coined this gem ?

McConnell stated flat out his priority is to make sure Obama isn't RS>elected to a second term.

Excellent. I am with Mitch.

He's doing so by by obstructing *EVERYTHING* in the Senate, even
bills he himself used to support.

If it stops Obama's agenda, I am with Mitch.

McConnell and his goons have set new records for their phony RS>"filibusters," which in reality are simply some senator saying "I
want to filibuster this."

It has nothing to do with actual filibustering.

It's just needless delay, petty crass politicking and childish RS>obstructionism.

You didn't talk this way when Puff Daschle was in office doing worse.

Obama and Reid have come up with one heckuva way to try to stop the
GOP senate tantrums, they don't leave DC and go home for the holidays RS>unless they knock off the BS and pass DADT repeal, 9-11 first
responder health care, and ratifying the START treaty.

And it worked.

Well a new sheriff takes over soon. Since almost all legislation starts
in the House, the Senate will soon be under control. I've leave you to
figure out what legislation doesn't start in the House.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats -- The party of economic slavery ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

Latest one was over my asking about a porn star a friend was
telling me about, who is 25, looking like she's 10.

It's her gimmick.

And it disgusts me.

Should she be able to do her "schtick?"
I'm leaning somewhat against it, HOWEVER...there is that little
thing called the First Amendment.

Something *YOUR* boys want to repeal.
"No Muslims!"
"No Methodists!"
"No Jews!"

If it has to do with underage sex, you can count on him to be
all over it. I have never seen someone so obsessed with it.

I guess that means you're for underage sex.

No, it means I am observing your obsession. I wasn't the one previously defending NAMBLA. I am not the one who continually brings up this
topic.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats -- The party of death ......

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer" <1:226/600> wrote in news:31780
$POL_INC@JamNNTPd:

Mitch the Bitch and his cheerleaders are really throwing

tantrums.

$20 against the Clinton jail fund that nobody else here, but
you, knows what this means.

You mean Sludge didn't tell you what to think on this?

Again, I have no idea what you are referencing. Is this
something that Rachel programmed you to say ?

Mitch McConnell has earned the moniker "Mitch the Bitch" since he

has

this habit of pushing his agenda of "screw Obama no matter who it
hurts."

Really ? Which of your leftwing brethren coined this gem ?

I no longer remember where I first heard this.

I do notice you are avoiding strenuously the facts about McConnell.

McConnell stated flat out his priority is to make sure Obama isn't
elected to a second term.

Excellent. I am with Mitch.

Accroding to Ann Coulter, you're a traitor.

He's doing so by by obstructing *EVERYTHING* in the Senate, even
bills he himself used to support.

If it stops Obama's agenda, I am with Mitch.

Petty, childish obstructionism for crass political gain.
Guess what. Obama *WON* the election. And contrary to the fevered whines
from your gurus, he didn't cheat.

McConnell and his goons have set new records for their phony
"filibusters," which in reality are simply some senator saying "I
want to filibuster this."

It has nothing to do with actual filibustering.

It's just needless delay, petty crass politicking and childish
obstructionism.

You didn't talk this way when Puff Daschle was in office doing worse.

Whatever Tom Daschle did has been *FAR* surpassed.
Lame attempt at diversion. Again.

Obama and Reid have come up with one heckuva way to try to stop the
GOP senate tantrums, they don't leave DC and go home for the

holidays

unless they knock off the BS and pass DADT repeal, 9-11 first
responder health care, and ratifying the START treaty.

And it worked.

Well a new sheriff takes over soon. Since almost all legislation

starts

in the House, the Senate will soon be under control. I've leave you

to

figure out what legislation doesn't start in the House.

We're already seeing what the Tebagger gontingent is doing.
Hiring lobbyists as key staffers.

I don't see any "New sheriff in town."

I see a power grab with the far-right dictating the agenda.
And some nitwit will demand an "investigation" into everything and
anything they can think of, just like Newt's goons in the 90's.

There's a big difference between governing and just sloganeering.
The teabag contingent is going to learn that rather quickly.

BTW, California is thanking our governor-elect, and yours, for throwing
their little snitfit about high-speed rail.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer" <1:226/600> wrote in news:31781
$POL_INC@JamNNTPd:

Latest one was over my asking about a porn star a friend was
telling me about, who is 25, looking like she's 10.

It's her gimmick.

And it disgusts me.

Should she be able to do her "schtick?"
I'm leaning somewhat against it, HOWEVER...there is that little
thing called the First Amendment.

Something *YOUR* boys want to repeal.
"No Muslims!"
"No Methodists!"
"No Jews!"

If it has to do with underage sex, you can count on him to be
all over it. I have never seen someone so obsessed with it.

I guess that means you're for underage sex.

No, it means I am observing your obsession. I wasn't the one previously defending NAMBLA. I am not the one who continually brings up this
topic.

So you approve of supressing speech?

Kim would be so proud of you.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

Mitch the Bitch and his cheerleaders are really throwing

tantrums.

$20 against the Clinton jail fund that nobody else here, but JB>>>>> you, knows what this means.

You mean Sludge didn't tell you what to think on this?

Again, I have no idea what you are referencing. Is this
something that Rachel programmed you to say ?

Mitch McConnell has earned the moniker "Mitch the Bitch" since

he has

this habit of pushing his agenda of "screw Obama no matter who
it hurts."

Really ? Which of your leftwing brethren coined this gem ?

I no longer remember where I first heard this.

Yet you acknowledge that it came from one of your far left whacko
sources.

I do notice you are avoiding strenuously the facts about McConnell.

McConnell stated flat out his priority is to make sure Obama
isn't elected to a second term.

Excellent. I am with Mitch.

Accroding to Ann Coulter, you're a traitor.

Sure. Whatever you want to believe.

He's doing so by by obstructing *EVERYTHING* in the Senate,
even bills he himself used to support.

If it stops Obama's agenda, I am with Mitch.

Petty, childish obstructionism for crass political gain.
Guess what. Obama *WON* the election. And contrary to the fevered
whines from your gurus, he didn't cheat.

Obstructionism and more are called for when a far left agenda is being
pushed that will destroy this country.

McConnell and his goons have set new records for their phony
"filibusters," which in reality are simply some senator saying
"I want to filibuster this."

It has nothing to do with actual filibustering.

It's just needless delay, petty crass politicking and childish
obstructionism.

You didn't talk this way when Puff Daschle was in office doing

worse.

Whatever Tom Daschle did has been *FAR* surpassed.
Lame attempt at diversion. Again.

You have no clue.

Obama and Reid have come up with one heckuva way to try to stop
the GOP senate tantrums, they don't leave DC and go home for

the holidays

unless they knock off the BS and pass DADT repeal, 9-11 first
responder health care, and ratifying the START treaty.

And it worked.

Well a new sheriff takes over soon. Since almost all

legislation starts

in the House, the Senate will soon be under control. I've leave

you to

figure out what legislation doesn't start in the House.

We're already seeing what the Tebagger gontingent is doing.
Hiring lobbyists as key staffers.

I don't see any "New sheriff in town."

Keep watching.

I see a power grab with the far-right dictating the agenda.
And some nitwit will demand an "investigation" into everything and RS>anything they can think of, just like Newt's goons in the 90's.

There's a big difference between governing and just sloganeering.
The teabag contingent is going to learn that rather quickly.

Obama never learned this. He's been in campaign mode since he took
office. He is just now learning how difficult it is to govern. Many of
us warned of the dangers of him learning on the job. I think few
realized how dearly it would cost this country.

BTW, California is thanking our governor-elect, and yours, for
throwing their little snitfit about high-speed rail.

California needs to worry about paying its bills. They may become the
first state to default on their debt.



Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats -- The party of economic obstruction ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

Latest one was over my asking about a porn star a friend was
telling me about, who is 25, looking like she's 10.

It's her gimmick.

And it disgusts me.

Should she be able to do her "schtick?"
I'm leaning somewhat against it, HOWEVER...there is that
little thing called the First Amendment.

Something *YOUR* boys want to repeal.
"No Muslims!"
"No Methodists!"
"No Jews!"

If it has to do with underage sex, you can count on him to be
all over it. I have never seen someone so obsessed with it.

I guess that means you're for underage sex.

No, it means I am observing your obsession. I wasn't the one previously defending NAMBLA. I am not the one who continually
brings up this topic.

So you approve of supressing speech?

<Macro on> I have no idea what you are talking about. </Macro on>


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Patriotism is not who can leak the most Secret documents to the NY Times ...

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)