Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 64:27:16 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,938 |
| Messages: | 99,119 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
I've been testing Windows 3.11 (WFWG actually) to see how far I
could push it. Sure, you can crash it, but after countless hours of tweaking and configuring, I have it running 2 nodes of PCBoard with
my tcp fossil and Netware Client32 TCP/IP. Seems stable, good enough
to use.
I use QEMM97 as the memory manager, Windows seems happy with it.
Gives me plenty of low memory inside each DOS box. After loading my
tcp fossil tsr, which takes only 15k, I still have plenty left for
PCBoard:
604k low memory, 2meg EMS, 8meg XMS, and the HMA is available too,
DOS is loaded low. QEMM97 is good for that. And though not listed,
Windows provides DPMI memory too.
That's a lot of 16-bit territory to explore. Not that it's relevant
to the modern world in any way, most programmers could care less.
But to me it's fun.
I have never trusted Windows to run my BBS reliably but I did run it
under DOS/DeskView before testing it under OS/2.
We can both run about 4 nodes. But OS/2 is more difficult to install
and maintain. It has little or no real advantage.
a Windows crash happens so often
The OS/2 installation is very straightforward and easy
The OS/2 installation is very straightforward and easy especially the
Warp 4 one because of the detailed information carried in the documen- tation in the "Up and running with OS/2 version 4" book with detailed worksheets for different ways of set-up. Starting with v2.1 the install was along the lines of any DOS program installation and improved along
the versions to Warp v4.
The OS/2 installation is very straightforward and easy especially the
Warp 4 one because of the detailed information carried in the documen- tation in the "Up and running with OS/2 version 4" book .........
The trouble with the OS/2 Warp installation was that it would not
install. I tried numerous times. Same error each time. It simply
did not see my CD drive. Tried different drive, same problem
I'm surprised to learn this because I have never exprienced difficulties at installation. In 1995 I added a Hitachi CD-drive without problems and later (-98) changed it to a Nakamichi 5-disk changer w/o problems again.
In the meantime I had also used a HP CD drive w/o problems.
I did use the Adaptec aspicd driver in both the two earlier instances, then the Nakamichi was delivered with mjaspi drivers.
You had to be careful at the first installation that you didn't have
a HD over 2 Mb size. That was solved by installing OS/2 on a <2Mb partition and after that formatting the rest of the HD.
Then came the Danis's drivers that solved the HD problem and later also new drivers from IBM.
I have never tried to install OS/2 on anything else but SCSI systems.
but I was never able to get to that point. It simply would not read
the CD. You started the setup with a floppy drive if I remember
correctly, and then inserted the CD.
but I was never able to get to that point. It simply would not read
the CD. You started the setup with a floppy drive if I remember
correctly, and then inserted the CD.
Correct!
As they say, YMMV. I have installed OS/2 on various machines starting
with v2.1 up to Warp 4 and then FP12 always w/o any difficulties.
CU L8ER,
As they say, YMMV. I have installed OS/2 on various machines starting
with v2.1 up to Warp 4 and then FP12 always w/o any difficulties.
As they say, YMMV. I have installed OS/2 on various machines starting
with v2.1 up to Warp 4 and then FP12 always w/o any difficulties.
I seem to recall reading something at the time that only specific CD
drives would work as they were the only drivers included in the
setup. I may be wrong after this many years. In any case I gave up
after multiple attempts.
As they say, YMMV. I have installed OS/2 on various machines starting
with v2.1 up to Warp 4 and then FP12 always w/o any difficulties.
Maybe 20 years ago. But try finding such old hardware nowdays. It's
rare even on Ebay. With contemporary hardware, it's not so easy.
Mind you, my latest two installations were made this year, one to a
laptop and one to a floor standing machine.
Anything else you want to know?
In one of the manuals shipped with either Warp 3 or 4 there is a discussion on installation considerations of various makes of CD drives.
There are a lot of drivers in the installation disks for various makes
but I have installed CD drives without any of them, just using Adaptecs aspicd.sys. My first installation with a Hitachi CD drive was using that
Anything else you want to know?
I know installing OS/2 is difficult, if not impossible, on most
hardware you can buy today. Hardly easy, as you claim. That's one
reason OS/2 has so few users. The few who remain, use mostly old
hardware, vintage of an earlier era.
Your knowledge isn't worth much
but talk is cheap!
but talk is cheap!
Lacking facts, they make personal attacks. Trolls, they are.
There are a lot of drivers in the installation disks for various makes
but I have installed CD drives without any of them, just using Adaptecs aspicd.sys. My first installation with a Hitachi CD drive was using that
If you used Scssi, then that is a different story. <G>
If you used Scssi, then that is a different story. <G>
Well, you wrote earlier that you also used SCSI and I supposed it was
when you ran or did setup the BBS.
attacks were started by one party
and now they seem to simply be being returned...
You claimed to install OS/2 recently, but you won't provide hardware details.
Your claim that OS/2 is "easy" to install does not stand up to the
facts.
attacks were started by one party
I challenged the truth of certain claims made, and asked for
supporting facts. That's not a personal attack.
and now they seem to simply be being returned...
No, they failed to respond with facts, and got personal. If
factual discussions offend them, they are free to leave.
i can easily have the area removed from
the backbone and taken to private distribution...
if folks can't be civil and not condescending to and sniping
at each other, then that is what i will do... it is either that or
just close the area altogether...
that doesn't mean that the echolist listing will go away and be free
for grabs, though ;)
i did echolist it and do what was needed to keep the area on the
backbone for you and at least two others... please don't make me
regret that decision...
you won't provide hardware details.
It was a computer owned by another person. It was a Dell that had
been delivered with Windows 7, 160Gb HD and 8Gb RAM.
Your claim that OS/2 is "easy" to install
I installed OS/2 Warp 4 + FP12 on a new HD and let the customer use
the OS/2 Boot Manager to start whichever operating system he wanted.
i can easily have the area removed from the backbone and taken to
private distribution...
The echo was working for me before you took over. I get no benefit
from your efforts.
Well, you wrote earlier that you also used SCSI and I supposed it was
when you ran or did setup the BBS.
Indeed I did. 7 1Gb SCSSI Hard drives back in the early 90s. That
was a lot of space back then <G>
i got several netmails about both sides of the conversation...
Well, you wrote earlier that you also used SCSI and I supposed it
was when you ran or did setup the BBS.
Indeed I did. 7 1Gb SCSSI Hard drives back in the early 90s. That
was a lot of space back then <G>
Sure was and still today OS/2 Warp 4 occupies only 120 Mb for the OS complete with GUI.
The early versions before Warp 3 didn't have much of a GUI However.
The echo was working for me before you took over. I get no
benefit from your efforts.
and when the next purge of non-echolisted areas came, the echo would
have been removed...
you do get benefit even if you are/were not aware of it ;)
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little traffic here, it's an easy job.
The early versions before Warp 3 didn't have much of a GUI
Never saw much of OS2 prior to the Warp 3 and late versions. Even
the large computer shows like Computex where IBM had a large
presence, did not have a single machine running OS2. IBM had Windows installed on their computers.
i got several netmails about both sides of the conversation...
That's one of the things wrong with Fidonet. It encourages whiny backstabbing netmail, from whiny backstabbing sysops.
All my remarks are public.
The echo was working for me before you took over. I get no
benefit from your efforts.
and when the next purge of non-echolisted areas came, the echo would
have been removed...
Removed from what? The backbone?
Or you mean nobody, nohwere, would see it?
you do get benefit even if you are/were not aware of it ;)
Thanks for your efforts making it available to people. That is
truly helpful. But please leave it at that, and quit the
moderators job. It's obviously a headache for you.
I volunteer. My only rules are:
a) No top posting. And trim your quoted text.
b) No repetitive or pointless profanity.
c) No spamming off topic ads, e.g, viagra, penile enlargement, etc.
d) No relentless off topic threads. Chit chat is not categorically prohibited, but at some point it must die.
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little
traffic here, it's an easy job.
Hiya Mark...
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little
traffic here, it's an easy job.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
Your claim that OS/2 is "easy" to install
I don't think you can do it on a hard drive > 137gb without
modifying the install disks.
I'm willing to hear more details of the procedure you followed.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
with that all said, i am NOT trying to wanting to control the
discussions in this area... we're all adults here and we should be
able to moderate ourselves... i elisted this area to keep it on the distribution systems that require such for them to carry areas... i
don't care to try to push some mythical ""weight"" around... i accept
public and private comments about situations related to the echo...
this is why i made the comment previously about having access to
netmail...
those are pretty close to those i post, aren't they?? i certainly
don't want to and never have tried to act like ""daddy in charge""...
if you want the task and can maintain the echolisting,
contact me in private and we can go from there...
otherwise, perhaps we should maybe hold an election or something?
that hasn't been mentioned but i am not against to it...
I don't think you can do it on a hard drive > 137gb without
modifying the install disks.
That's exactly what I have done a long time ago. It took some time to
get install working that way so it's not for the average user.
Holger and Jeff, speak up if you have any interest in the job.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
with that all said, i am NOT trying to wanting to control the
discussions in this area... we're all adults here and we should be
able to moderate ourselves... i elisted this area to keep it on the distribution systems that require such for them to carry areas... i
don't care to try to push some mythical ""weight"" around... i accept
public and private comments about situations related to the echo...
this is why i made the comment previously about having access to
netmail...
those are pretty close to those i post, aren't they?? i certainly
don't want to and never have tried to act like ""daddy in charge""...
if you want the task and can maintain the echolisting,
contact me in private and we can go from there...
otherwise, perhaps we should maybe hold an election or something?
that hasn't been mentioned but i am not against to it...
I don't think you can do it on a hard drive > 137gb without
modifying the install disks.
That's exactly what I have done a long time ago. It took some time to
get install working that way so it's not for the average user.
Holger and Jeff, speak up if you have any interest in the job.
The early versions before Warp 3 didn't have much of a GUI However.
Never saw much of OS2 prior to the Warp 3 and late versions. Even
the large computer shows like Computex where IBM had a large
presence, did not have a single machine running OS2. IBM had
Windows installed on their computers.
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little
traffic here, it's an easy job.
contact me in private and we can go from there... otherwise, perhaps otherwise perhaps we should maybe hold an election or something?
that hasn't been mentioned but i am not against to it...
On 12-21-14 17:28, John Kelly wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
Says the off topic Synchronet sysop. Go pester the Synchronet people
with your bloated sig ads.
Says the off topic Synchronet sysop. Go pester the Synchronet people
with your bloated sig ads.
Maybe. But not just anybody qualifies as a candidate. A moderator needs moral authority on the topic. That could be an active PCBoard sysop, or someone who can at least compile the source.
Of that group, only three have posted here recently. Me, Holger, and
Jeff. So Holger and Jeff, speak up if you have any interest in the job.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
Says the off topic Synchronet sysop. Go pester the Synchronet people
with your bloated sig ads.
Holger Granholm wrote to Joe Delahaye <=-
Very few know about OS/2 and it's a pity. Another operating system that disappeared was the Amiga. It was a very good OS with a bright future
but it stumbled on the opinion that Amiga's were only for playing
games.
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little traffic here, it's an easy job.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
On 01-06-15 20:32, ROBERT WOLFE wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-
Other than that, I won't play Daddy in charge. With so little traffic here, it's an easy job.
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
God, why do I want to laugh at this :)
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
hahaha...
LOL... the roy witt of z2... :)
hahaha...
An off topic personal attack, with no substance whatsoever, is
funny to the moderator?