• GOP HYPOCRISY

    From Bob Ackley@1:300/3 to John Massey on Fri Feb 12 05:42:30 2010
    Replying to a message of John Massey to Ross Cassell:

    It is truly amazing to me that somebody like RS can't tell
    the difference between social welfare programs and Social
    Security. I guess it's the "social" part that has him
    befuddled, He should know that Social Security is an
    insurance program.

    Actually, Socialist Security is an insurance program in name only. If it
    had to run like a real insurance program (a) the premiums would be at least twice and possibly three times what they are and (b) the benefits would be
    less - much less. Of course, if it had to run like a real insurance program the taxpayers wouldn't have to bail it out every couple of decades. 2010
    is the first year since 1980 (the last time Socialist Security was bailed out by the taxpayers) that benefits paid will exceed contributions received.

    Been discussing this in another echo. My point is that after three to five years of benefits, one has exhausted all of one's contributions into the program
    and all of the (theoretical) interest those contributions generated (the government
    doesn't pay interest to itself, so any such interest is accounting fiction, not
    real
    money). Since most recipients draw benefits for longer than five years - much longer in many cases (my grandparents drew it for over 20 years, and they died 30 years ago), the benefits they draw are paid for by Joe Taxpayer after they reach
    that point. I noted that I will exhaust my contributions to Socialist Security
    in
    about 2012 and will then become a welfare bum - but since the world is going to end in 2012 I won't be one for very long.

    Note that nearly all government (and not just federal government) programs end up
    costing far more than their proponents claimed. The current Reason contains an article on that subject. When the politicians were trying to get Medicare enacted
    they claimed the program would *never* cost more than $2billion a year; after it
    was enacted they estimated that in 1990 Medicare benefits would cost about $12 billion (up by a factor of six in less than two years) - in fact the benefits paid
    in 1990 were somewhere around $95 billion (just shy of eight times the estimate
    -
    and 47 times the original claim) and they're well over $110 billion today.

    If it was run by any private business
    would have been put out of business, but because it's run
    by the government people like RS that seem to think that
    they're entitled to it, whether they paid into it or not.

    Actually there are a LOT of people who are ineligible to draw Socialist Security.
    Some people can opt out of the program (preachers, among others). I don't think
    federal government civilian employees are required to pay into it either (military
    employees are required to - but you already know that <g>).

    ---
    * Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3)
  • From Bob Ackley@1:300/3 to Ross Cassell on Fri Feb 12 05:28:40 2010
    Replying to a message of Ross Cassell to Ross Sauer:

    SC is not that big a tobacco grower as Tennessee or North
    Carolina.

    Aside from that the taxes on tobacco are going through the
    roof.

    Are? Cigarettes used to be about $2/carton, now they're about $30/carton
    (I admit I haven't checked closely, it's one bad habit I don't have - but I have
    lots of others to make up for it <g>) - and the difference is all taxes.

    I've already shown how corn farmers get thiese direct
    subsidies, they get in a month more than I would get in 25
    years.

    Oh that's different!

    Yes it is.

    I know a lot of farmers. Most grow either corn or soybeans (and most switch crops every couple of years - the field surrounding my house is usually corn but
    in 2009 it was soybeans). AFAIK none of them are getting much if anything from the Crop Reserve Program (which is the outfit that pays farmers not to grow crops).
    There isn't much land around here that is in that program.

    ---
    * Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3)
  • From Jeff Binkley@1:226/600 to Stan Hardegree on Sat Feb 13 05:30:00 2010



    If all you can do is *LIE* about Olbermann and Maddow, it proves
    what a *FAKE* Moron...I mean Mormon you are.

    Anybody have any idea what has this idiot so wound up?

    Obama's poll numbers keep dropping and his leftwing agenda is dying ?


    Jeff

    CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
    Carbon Dioxide makes up just 390 parts per million of atmosphere ....

    --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
    * Origin: (1:226/600)
  • From Ross Sauer@1:123/789 to Bob Ackley on Sat Feb 13 08:24:03 2010
    "Bob Ackley -> Ross Cassell" <1:300/3> wrote in
    news:20276$MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

    I've already shown how corn farmers get thiese direct
    subsidies, they get in a month more than I would get in 25
    years.

    Oh that's different!

    Yes it is.

    I know a lot of farmers. Most grow either corn or soybeans (and most switch crops every couple of years - the field surrounding my house is usually corn but
    in 2009 it was soybeans). AFAIK none of them are getting much if
    anything from the Crop Reserve Program (which is the outfit that pays farmers not to grow crops).
    There isn't much land around here that is in that program.

    So who does get those billions of $$$ not to grow anything?
    The answer is, wealthy corporate farmers.

    --- Xnews/5.04.25
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)
  • From Ed Hulett@1:123/789 to Stan Hardegree on Sat Feb 13 12:52:34 2010
    On 02/12/2010 04:52 PM, Stan Hardegree -> Ross Sauer wrote:
    If all you can do is *LIE* about Olbermann and Maddow, it proves what a
    *FAKE* Moron...I mean Mormon you are.

    Anybody have any idea what has this idiot so wound up?

    He's wound up because he's Otto Ar-Kay Sauer and that's how he rolls.

    Ed

    --
    "Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the
    entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world
    disagrees with it." --Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135-1204)

    Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

    Facebook: http://wwwfacebook.com/ed.hulett | Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yaesu

    Linux User #416016
    Linux Machine #385030

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100213 Light
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)
  • From Stan Hardegree@1:123/789 to Ed Hulett on Sat Feb 13 13:00:47 2010
    AS>> If all you can do is *LIE* about Olbermann and Maddow, it proves what
    a
    AS>> *FAKE* Moron...I mean Mormon you are.

    SH> Anybody have any idea what has this idiot so wound up?

    He's wound up because he's Otto Ar-Kay Sauer and that's how he rolls.

    Hahahahahaha!! As good an explanation as any, I guess.

    --- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)
  • From Jeff Binkley@1:226/600 to Bob Ackley on Sat Feb 13 17:43:00 2010



    It is truly amazing to me that somebody like RS can't tell
    the difference between social welfare programs and Social
    Security. I guess it's the "social" part that has him
    befuddled, He should know that Social Security is an
    insurance program.

    Actually, Socialist Security is an insurance program in name only.
    If it had to run like a real insurance program (a) the premiums would
    be at least twice and possibly three times what they are and (b) the BA>benefits would be less - much less. Of course, if it had to run like
    a real insurance program the taxpayers wouldn't have to bail it out
    every couple of decades. 2010 is the first year since 1980 (the last BA>time Socialist Security was bailed out by the taxpayers) that
    benefits paid will exceed contributions received.

    Been discussing this in another echo. My point is that after three
    to five years of benefits, one has exhausted all of one's
    contributions into the program
    and all of the (theoretical) interest those contributions generated
    (the government
    doesn't pay interest to itself, so any such interest is accounting BA>fiction, not real
    money). Since most recipients draw benefits for longer than five
    years - much longer in many cases (my grandparents drew it for over
    20 years, and they died 30 years ago), the benefits they draw are
    paid for by Joe Taxpayer after they reach
    that point. I noted that I will exhaust my contributions to
    Socialist Security in
    about 2012 and will then become a welfare bum - but since the world
    is going to end in 2012 I won't be one for very long.

    Note that nearly all government (and not just federal government) BA>programs end up
    costing far more than their proponents claimed. The current Reason BA>contains an article on that subject. When the politicians were
    trying to get Medicare enacted
    they claimed the program would *never* cost more than $2billion a
    year; after it
    was enacted they estimated that in 1990 Medicare benefits would cost BA>about $12 billion (up by a factor of six in less than two years) - in BA>fact the benefits paid
    in 1990 were somewhere around $95 billion (just shy of eight times
    the estimate -
    and 47 times the original claim) and they're well over $110 billion BA>today.

    Medicare and Social Security have $1.47T budgeted in Obama's latest
    budget for 2011. Together they are 50% of the entire federal budget and
    over 10% of GDP for the entire US. This is why these massive social
    programs are unststainable.


    Jeff

    CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
    Democrats -- The party of economic slavery ....

    --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
    * Origin: (1:226/600)