This isn't about me

Of course it is!

but about the lack of consistency and hypocrisy of the left (which

includes you).

See! That's why it's about YOU!

You attack the person...not the idea or ideals.

Myself, I see DAILY the blatant lies of the Right on FOX, and hear Limbaugh and
such doing the same as well!

But what does..."you did it first" do?

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

I only ask where they are now.

I'm wondering where the TRUE media is as well.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

I thought you wanted less "Gubment"!

Unless it's to treat women like they are little children, like in

Oklahoma.

I know!

They want women to suffer another RAPE so as to get an abortion!

You fugs ALWAYS be screaming for a' suck at the teet when time get
bad!

Republicans who voted against the Stimulus are all too happy to appear in photo-ops handing out Stimulus checks.

Republicans who voted against the Health Care Reform bill are also all too happy now to take credit for that bill, in other photo-ops.

They are hypocrites or fools...Republicans, that is.

The smart profiteers lead the country sheep.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

I thought you wanted less "Gubment"!

Unless it's to treat women like they are little children, like in

Oklahoma.

SV: Otto is immune to irony.

That wasn't irony, it was realism.

Thus, Ross "got it".

Fool!

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

SV: Otto is immune to irony.

And you have *NO* clue as to what I'm referring to, as usual.

It's like they plan, at night, on how to be obtuse. ;)

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

"Steve Kemp -> Jeff Binkley" <1:123/789.0> wrote in news:20889$MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The myth of the "liberal media" was pushed on and off, haphazardly mostly,
by certain groups, until the Cold War.
During the 1950's paranoid red-baiting groups like the John Birch Society pushed the "liberal" (re: communist) media meme to their followers.

During the late 60's Richard Nixon and his chief henchman, Spiro Agnew,
pushed the "liberal news media" meme to try to deal with increasing
exposure of the Nixon administration corruption.

During the 1980's, "liberal media" accusations would get tossed around a
lot by the corrupt right-wing groups and spokespersons, like the Moonie
Times, and Jerry Falwell.

These accusations came together in the 1990's, with wild accusations of "liberal bias," from the same people who would make up the most scurrilous accusations of the Clintons. All of which fell apart under actual scrutiny.

During the 2000's, any critics of George Bush and his corrupt regime were labeled "liberal traitors that are biased."

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many conservatives as commentators, who are rarely if ever challenged.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many conservatives as commentators, who are rarely if ever challenged.

uP IS DOWN AND RIGHT IS WROng.

I have to pay cash money to listen to Randi Rhodes consistently, but Rusty Limburger gets every forking radio tower in the valley!

And the media is liberal?

To THEM any liberal view is communist!

NPR is communist!

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

This isn't about me

Of course it is!

but about the lack of consistency and hypocrisy of the left

(which includes you).

See! That's why it's about YOU!

You attack the person...not the idea or ideals.

I am attacking the hypocrisy of the left. Do try to understand the difference. I am attacking a behavior.

Myself, I see DAILY the blatant lies of the Right on FOX, and hear SK>Limbaugh and such doing the same as well!

I rarely get to listen to Rush. He is on while I am working.

But what does..."you did it first" do?

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The majority of the media is left to far left. That is why so much of
it is going bust. Ask yourself if they were all the same, why is
NewsCorp doing well and the majority of the others are struggling to
stay afloat ?

I only ask where they are now.

I'm wondering where the TRUE media is as well.

You may never find your answer.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Stop the Democrat party oil embargo ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

I thought you wanted less "Gubment"!

Unless it's to treat women like they are little children, like

in Oklahoma.

I know!

They want women to suffer another RAPE so as to get an abortion!

Rape is a very small percentage reason for abortions and not all rapes
end in pregnancies. Don't let these facts stop a good liberal rant.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats -- The party of death ......

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The myth of the "liberal media" was pushed on and off, haphazardly RS>mostly, by certain groups, until the Cold War.
During the 1950's paranoid red-baiting groups like the John Birch
Society pushed the "liberal" (re: communist) media meme to their RS>followers.

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many conservatives as RS>commentators, who are rarely if ever challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will eventually go
under along with the Washington Post, NY Times and others.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Carbon Dioxide makes up just 390 parts per million of atmosphere ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

"Jeff Binkley -> Steve Kemp" <1:226/600> wrote in news:20899 $MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

The majority of the media is left to far left. That is why so much of

In conservafairyland, maybe.

it is going bust. Ask yourself if they were all the same, why is
NewsCorp doing well and the majority of the others are struggling to
stay afloat ?

Murdoch's titty tabloid empire gets big profits by appealing to the baser crowd, with sex and violence.
Sensationalism sells.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer" <1:226/600> wrote in news:20904 $MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The myth of the "liberal media" was pushed on and off, haphazardly
mostly, by certain groups, until the Cold War.
During the 1950's paranoid red-baiting groups like the John Birch
Society pushed the "liberal" (re: communist) media meme to their
followers.

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many conservatives as
commentators, who are rarely if ever challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will eventually go
under along with the Washington Post, NY Times and others.

The Post and NY Times are not going under.

The Moonie Times is.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

On 05/08/2010 10:08 AM, Ross Sauer -> Jeff Binkley wrote:

"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer" <1:226/600> wrote in news:20904 $MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The myth of the "liberal media" was pushed on and off, haphazardly
mostly, by certain groups, until the Cold War.
During the 1950's paranoid red-baiting groups like the John Birch
Society pushed the "liberal" (re: communist) media meme to their
followers.

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many conservatives as
commentators, who are rarely if ever challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will eventually go
under along with the Washington Post, NY Times and others.

The Post and NY Times are not going under.

The NYT and WaPo are almost bankrupt. They both have had to borrow heavily to remain solvent. They are both busily throwing the deck chairs overboard while their Titanics sink.

The Moonie Times is.

And?

Ed

--
"For it is a truth, which the experience of all ages has attested, that the people
are commonly most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the possession of those [toward] whom they entertain the least suspicion." --Alexander Hamilton

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Facebook: http://wwwfacebook.com/ed.hulett | Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yaesu

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderb
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)

The majority of the media is left to far left. That is why so

much of

In conservafairyland, maybe.

it is going bust. Ask yourself if they were all the same, why
is NewsCorp doing well and the majority of the others are
struggling to stay afloat ?

Murdoch's titty tabloid empire gets big profits by appealing to the
baser crowd, with sex and violence.
Sensationalism sells.

I see and you figured this all out how ? With your extensive work
experience in the private sector or your vast microeconomics and
business management education ?


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Barak Obama thinks we can spend our way to prosperity .....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

Them and their main stream media were
the ones crying these cries.

You mean the conservative media? Or it it the sleeping media?

The myth of the "liberal media" was pushed on and off,
haphazardly mostly, by certain groups, until the Cold War.
During the 1950's paranoid red-baiting groups like the John
Birch Society pushed the "liberal" (re: communist) media meme
to their followers.

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many
conservatives as commentators, who are rarely if ever
challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will
eventually go under along with the Washington Post, NY Times and others.

The Post and NY Times are not going under.

I said eventually go under. Both have been shrinking for a number of
years. There isn't much more shrinking they can do before either going
under, merging or being bought. I am not sure who would but either one
at this point.

The Moonie Times is.

So they are going under because they are liberal ?


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
Democrats -- The party that penalizes success and rewards failure ...

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
* Origin: (1:226/600)

Replying to a message of Ross Sauer to Jeff Binkley:

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many
conservatives as commentators, who are rarely if ever
challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will
eventually go under along with the Washington Post, NY
Times and others.

The Post and NY Times are not going under.

The Post *is*, however, trying to dump Newsweek Magazine on some
- any - unsuspecting buyer.

The Moonie Times is.

I won't miss it.

---
* Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3)

"Bob Ackley -> Ross Sauer" <1:300/3> wrote in news:20914
$MATZDOBRE@JamNNTPd:

Today, even the so-called "liberal" MSNBC has many
conservatives as commentators, who are rarely if ever
challenged.

They hired a couple to try and stay afloat. They will
eventually go under along with the Washington Post, NY
Times and others.

The Post and NY Times are not going under.

The Post *is*, however, trying to dump Newsweek Magazine on some
- any - unsuspecting buyer.

So I've read.
Well, if they do, they do.
No skin off my nose.

The Moonie Times is.

I won't miss it.

The mere fact that throughout the years the Moonie Church had to
subsidize the Washington Times with literally BILLIONS of $$$, speaks
volumes about it's content and management.

This isn't the only time I saw a conservative media outlet go under like
this.
Our local cable company used to carry during the 1990s, a commercial
network called "National Empowerment Television."

A television network for conservative information and opinion.

And they had some good programs, but a lot of nutjobs too like the John
Birch Society.
Yet even though NET was a commercial network, they had to do PBS-style begathons, to raise money for operating costs.

Finally in...(looks it up) 1997 they folded.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)