1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. CROSSFIRE

  • HAVING READ THE RULES.

    From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to ED HULETT on Sun Jul 15 08:23:00 2012
    On 07-14-12, ED HULETT said to EARL CROASMUN:

    On 07/14/2012 08:50 AM, Earl Croasmun -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
    Republican House members are NOW implicitly "Fascist", by
    classic definitional measure.

    Does that make the Democrat ones, socialists?

    No.
    Not implicitly, at least.
    The Repubs are unabashedly FOR Corporations running the "Gubment"!

    Then you have no idea what "fascist" means.

    Indeed. He just parrots the DNC narrative.

    In the past he has claimed to be libertarian, but I don't think he is familiar enough with ANY narrative -- democrat, republican, or
    libertarian -- to parrot it. He has very non-libertarian views of
    unions, and he seems to dislike fascism while liking unions, so he is
    not working from any consistent framework.


    I haven't read a single coherent word from SK since I first saw any of his EH>posts. I've been doing FIDO for more than 20 years now, too.


    Ditto! I've been reading FIDO since back in the late 80's-early 90's, and I've rarely seen a coherent post from that guy. Usually he pretty much destroys a discussion by his rants getting wilder and wilder, and the descent into silliness gets onto a steeper and steeper down-slant.


    Mainly, he's ignorable. Annoying sometimes, but ignorable.


    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 And Still Here. Join Us: www.DocsPl (1:123/140)
  • From Ed Hulett@1:123/789 to TIM RICHARDSON on Sun Jul 15 13:27:19 2012
    On 07/15/2012 05:23 AM, TIM RICHARDSON -> ED HULETT wrote:
    On 07-14-12, ED HULETT said to EARL CROASMUN:

    On 07/14/2012 08:50 AM, Earl Croasmun -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
    Republican House members are NOW implicitly "Fascist", by
    classic definitional measure.

    Does that make the Democrat ones, socialists?

    No.
    Not implicitly, at least.
    The Repubs are unabashedly FOR Corporations running the "Gubment"!

    Then you have no idea what "fascist" means.

    Indeed. He just parrots the DNC narrative.

    In the past he has claimed to be libertarian, but I don't think he is
    familiar enough with ANY narrative -- democrat, republican, or
    libertarian -- to parrot it. He has very non-libertarian views of
    unions, and he seems to dislike fascism while liking unions, so he is
    not working from any consistent framework.


    I haven't read a single coherent word from SK since I first saw any
    of his
    posts. I've been doing FIDO for more than 20 years now, too.


    Ditto! I've been reading FIDO since back in the late 80's-early 90's,
    and I've
    rarely seen a coherent post from that guy. Usually he pretty much
    destroys a
    discussion by his rants getting wilder and wilder, and the descent into silliness gets onto a steeper and steeper down-slant.


    Mainly, he's ignorable. Annoying sometimes, but ignorable.

    When I first read one of his rants, I assumed he was a 12 year old child who got on his mommy's computer without her knowledge, but his posts haven't changed for years so it appears he's just stuck on stupid.

    Ed

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)
  • From Jeff Binkley@1:226/600 to Earl Croasmun on Sat Jul 14 04:59:00 2012



    Republican House members are NOW implicitly "Fascist", by
    classic definitional measure.

    Does that make the Democrat ones, socialists?

    No.
    Not implicitly, at least.
    The Repubs are unabashedly FOR Corporations running the "Gubment"!

    Then you have no idea what "fascist" means.

    Indeed. He just parrots the DNC narrative.


    Jeff

    CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999
    Democrats -- The party of trickle-up poverty ....

    --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
    * Origin: (1:226/600)
  • From Earl Croasmun@1:261/38 to Jeff Binkley on Sat Jul 14 10:50:18 2012
    Republican House members are NOW implicitly "Fascist", by
    classic definitional measure.

    Does that make the Democrat ones, socialists?

    No.
    Not implicitly, at least.
    The Repubs are unabashedly FOR Corporations running the "Gubment"!

    Then you have no idea what "fascist" means.

    Indeed. He just parrots the DNC narrative.

    In the past he has claimed to be libertarian, but I don't think he is familiar enough with ANY narrative -- democrat, republican, or libertarian -- to parrot it. He has very non-libertarian views of unions, and he seems to dislike fascism while liking unions, so he is not working from any consistent framework.

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
  • From Ed Hulett@1:123/789 to Earl Croasmun on Sat Jul 14 19:34:59 2012
    On 07/14/2012 08:50 AM, Earl Croasmun -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
    Republican House members are NOW implicitly "Fascist", by
    classic definitional measure.

    Does that make the Democrat ones, socialists?

    No.
    Not implicitly, at least.
    The Repubs are unabashedly FOR Corporations running the "Gubment"!

    Then you have no idea what "fascist" means.

    Indeed. He just parrots the DNC narrative.

    In the past he has claimed to be libertarian, but I don't think he is familiar enough with ANY narrative -- democrat, republican, or
    libertarian -- to parrot it. He has very non-libertarian views of
    unions, and he seems to dislike fascism while liking unions, so he is
    not working from any consistent framework.

    I haven't read a single coherent word from SK since I first saw any of his posts. I've been doing FIDO for more than 20 years now, too.

    Ed

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
    * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)