Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 06:11:19 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,929 |
| Messages: | 98,371 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
I ran across this today. It's an examination of what makes up a
moral economy. I happen to find it a compatible philosophy. What
do you think?
************************************************************************
** 1. The economy exists for the person, not the person for the
economy.
2. All economic life should be shaped by moral principles.
Economic choices and institutions must be judged by how they
protect or undermine the life and dignity of the human person,
support the family and serve the common good.
3. A fundamental moral measure of any economy is how the poor
and vulnerable are faring.
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education,
health care, safe environment, economic security.)
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education,
health care, safe environment, economic security.)
Anytime a socialist liberal starts talking about morality, grab your
wallet and call your lawyer.
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education,
health care, safe environment, economic security.)
Anytime a socialist liberal starts talking about morality, grab
your wallet and call your lawyer.
I don't know about that, but when you see someone say things like
"The economy exists for the person, not the person for the economy"
you know right off that they understand nothing of economics.
Did you catch the "right to work" part? And the "corresponding duty
to work?" Interesting that the "right" to food does not have a EC>corresponding "duty" to eat. Nor is there a corresponding duty of EC>farmers to give away their food.
I ran across this today. It's an examination of what makes up a
moral economy. I happen to find it a compatible philosophy. What
do you think?
************************************************************************
** 1. The economy exists for the person, not the person for the
economy.
2. All economic life should be shaped by moral principles.
Economic choices and institutions must be judged by how they
protect or undermine the life and dignity of the human person,
support the family and serve the common good.
3. A fundamental moral measure of any economy is how the poor
and vulnerable are faring.
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education,
health care, safe environment, economic security.)
Anytime a socialist liberal starts talking about morality,
grab your wallet and call your lawyer.
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education,
health care, safe environment, economic security.)
Anytime a socialist liberal starts talking about morality, grab your
wallet and call your lawyer.
I don't know about that, but when you see someone say
things like "The economy exists for the person, not the
person for the economy" you know right off that they
understand nothing of economics.
Did you catch the "right to work" part? And the
"corresponding duty to work?" Interesting that the "right"
to food does not have a corresponding "duty" to eat. Nor
is there a corresponding duty of farmers to give away their
food.
4. All people have a right to life and to secure the basic
necessities of life (e.g., food, clothing, shelter, education, EC>>~> BK> health care, safe environment, economic security.)
Anytime a socialist liberal starts talking about morality, grab
your wallet and call your lawyer.
I don't know about that, but when you see someone say things like
"The economy exists for the person, not the person for the economy"
you know right off that they understand nothing of economics.
Indeed, especially the business aspect of it.
Did you catch the "right to work" part? And the "corresponding duty
to work?" Interesting that the "right" to food does not have a EC>>corresponding "duty" to eat. Nor is there a corresponding duty of EC>>farmers to give away their food.
Yes. Where I was really going towards is that the
socialist liberal will always start out talking about
equality, opportunity, fairness etc. Then about halfway
through the conversation it will turn into rights,
entitlements etc. They will often confuse opportunity with
entitlements.