Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 12:43:45 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,930 |
| Messages: | 98,474 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
Since I would have no reason to check the list before *RENEWING*
my echos
Since I would have no reason to check the list before *RENEWING*
my echos
Notice that he now falls back to weasel-wording. He already said
that he CHECKS the list before sending in a listing. That led him
into a deadend. He is careful not to say that he DID NOT check the
list, but to merely say that he HAD NO REASON to do so.
A renewal is the easiest thing in the world. You go to your EC>previously-sent e-mail to the echolist, and you send it again. He
did not do that in November. When he tried to ban two people, he EC>suddenly realized that he had never listed ALL-POLITICS and he tried
to grab it.
His intent is all the more obvious when you look and see that he had EC>renewed "all politics" and "debate" just 27 days earlier. Just those EC>two! They were good for the next six months. But on November 12 he EC>suddenly tried to list ALL-POLITICS for the first time, with no EC>accompanying renewal of "debate." I had listed it more than TEN
MONTHS earlier, and if he had checked ANY ONE of those lists he would EC>have KNOWN that fact. Just a few days ago he said he checks the list EC>before trying to list an echo, and now he has to backtrack so far as
to pretend that he hadn't checked the list for ten months! He
doesn't want to say that, though, so he weasels with talk about
whether or not he had a "reason" to do it.
Since I would have no reason to check the list before *RENEWING*
my echos
Notice that he now falls back to weasel-wording. He
already said that he CHECKS the list before sending in a
listing.
That led him into a deadend. CHECKS the list
before sending in a listing. That led him into a deadend.
He is careful not to say that he DID NOT check the list,
but to merely say that he HAD NO REASON to do so.
A renewal is the easiest thing in the world. You go to your previously-sent e-mail to the echolist, and you send it
again. He did not do that in November. When he tried to
ban two people, he suddenly realized that he had never
listed ALL-POLITICS and he tried to grab it.
His intent is all the more obvious when you look and see
that he had renewed "all politics" and "debate" just 27
days earlier. Just those two! They were good for the next
six months. But on November 12 he suddenly tried to list
ALL-POLITICS for the first time, with no accompanying
renewal of "debate." I had listed it more than TEN MONTHS
earlier, and if he had checked ANY ONE of those lists he
would have KNOWN that fact.
Just a few days ago he said he
checks the list before trying to list an echo, and now he
has to backtrack so far as to pretend that he hadn't
checked the list for ten months! He doesn't want to say
that, though, so he weasels with talk about whether or not
he had a "reason" to do it.
All leftists eventually turn to word parsing and changing
the definitions in order to try and win an argument.
Since I would have no reason to check the list before *RENEWING*
my echos
Notice that he now falls back to weasel-wording. He
Notice how Earl falls back to distortion and deception. Straight
out, I do not check my echos to see how they are listed before
renewing the listing.
already said that he CHECKS the list before sending in a
listing.
Yes. I have done that in every case where I listed a new echo. I do *NOT* do that if I have good reason to believe I already have the
echo listed. Is Earl actually fool enough to try to claim I meant I recheck the echolist every single time I relist an echo?
That led him into a deadend. CHECKS the list
before sending in a listing. That led him into a deadend.
No, it did not. It just gave Earl another excuse to twist and
deceive.
Ok, readers... either Earl knows a lot less than he wants you to
think he does, or he is counting on your ignorance to get away with
that.
When you renew an echo you do not send in a listing, you send in an update. Officially, an moderator update. Shortened to Mod Upd.
Just so you know a bit about how it works.
He is careful not to say that he DID NOT check the list,
but to merely say that he HAD NO REASON to do so.
Which is why I did not do it. Now, that's said straight out.
Hey, all readers... I have been at this long enough to know, if
you try to list an already listed echo without the correct
password, it won't work.
So, had I checked the echo list and found I did not have the
echo listed I would have known submitting an update would not
work.
A renewal is the easiest thing in the world. You go to your
previously-sent e-mail to the echolist, and you send it
again. He did not do that in November. When he tried to
ban two people, he suddenly realized that he had never
listed ALL-POLITICS and he tried to grab it.
Uh, that is a lie. He did not even offer that as speculation, he
said it as if it were a fact. That makes it a lie.
I have used two different email services, and two different BBSs and
4 different passwords for renewing All Politics in the two years I
have had it listed. In several cases I typed it all in rather than reusing an old update, for the simple reason I did not have an old
msg available on that service.
BFD. As I said, I have been at this for quite a few years. I
know you can't update an echo if you don't have the correct
password. I have enough copies of those msgs for the Debate
echo, when I used a password for another echo.
Earl truly thinks you are all fools or as corrupt as he is if he
thinks you are buying his deception. Or is he right?
His intent is all the more obvious when you look and see
that he had renewed "all politics" and "debate" just 27
days earlier. Just those two! They were good for the next
six months. But on November 12 he suddenly tried to list
ALL-POLITICS for the first time, with no accompanying
renewal of "debate." I had listed it more than TEN MONTHS
earlier, and if he had checked ANY ONE of those lists he
would have KNOWN that fact.
Well, you could say I gave him credit for enough integrity to
not poach another person's echo. However, giving Earl credit for integrity would be way out of line.
Just a few days ago he said he
checks the list before trying to list an echo, and now he
Yes, to list an echo originally, not to renew a listing.
has to backtrack so far as to pretend that he hadn't
checked the list for ten months! He doesn't want to say
that, though, so he weasels with talk about whether or not
he had a "reason" to do it.
Earl will take any sliver of an opening to deceive. Since anyone who reads the echolist home page knows you get a notice if someone tries
to list your echo, either Earl knows a lot less than he likes to
pretend, or Earl is just assuming you can be easily deceived.
BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn
All leftists eventually turn to word parsing and changing
the definitions in order to try and win an argument.
You just called Earl a leftist, since that's his speciality.
Ok, readers... either Earl knows a lot less than he wants you to
think he does, or he is counting on your ignorance to get away
with that.
When you renew an echo you do not send in a listing, you send in
an update. Officially, an moderator update. Shortened to
Mod Upd.
Just so you know a bit about how it works.
Hey, all readers... I have been at this long enough to know, if
you try to list an already listed echo without the correct
password, it won't work.
So, had I checked the echo list and found I did not have the
echo listed I would have known submitting an update would not
work.
A renewal is the easiest thing in the world. You go to your
previously-sent e-mail to the echolist, and you send it
again. He did not do that in November. When he tried to
ban two people, he suddenly realized that he had never
listed ALL-POLITICS and he tried to grab it.
Uh, that is a lie. He did not even offer that as speculation, he
said it as if it were a fact. That makes it a lie.
I have used two different email services, and two different BBSs
and 4 different passwords for renewing All Politics in the two
years I have had it listed.
In several cases I typed it all in rather than reusing an old update,
for the simple reason I did not have an old msg available on that
service.
BFD. As I said, I have been at this for quite a few years. I
know you can't update an echo if you don't have the correct
password. I have enough copies of those msgs for the Debate
echo, when I used a password for another echo.
Earl truly thinks you are all fools or as corrupt as he is if he
thinks you are buying his deception. Or is he right?
Well, you could say I gave him credit for enough integrity to
not poach another person's echo. However, giving Earl credit for
integrity would be way out of line.
All leftists eventually turn to word parsing and changing
the definitions in order to try and win an argument.
You just called Earl a leftist, since that's his speciality.
anyone
who reads the echolist home page knows you get a notice if
someone tries to list your echo
Replying to a message of BOB KLAHN to JEFF BINKLEY:
All leftists eventually turn to word parsing and changing
the definitions in order to try and win an argument.
You just called Earl a leftist, since that's his speciality.
Why do you continue to attribute to others the behaviors
that you specialize in? You've
been mis-stating and misrepresenting other people's posts
for years. I have the archives
to prove it.
The ;receding was brought to you by Bob Klahn, the most
dishonest poster in Fidonet.
Draw your own concludions.
The Sunday deadline for this thread hasn't arrived yet, but
Bob has fully run it into the ground. All of the facts are
intact. He never listed the ALL-POLITICS echo. In
It is called a "hijack warning," and it only goes out if
the hijack fails. He has tried and failed several times. I
have never tried. Those are the documented facts. The
rest is just empty bluster from Klahn.