ok... so which group is for allowing gun ownership and which group is
for removing personal weapons?
Well, since the Constitution gives us the right to bear arms, no
one "allows" gun ownership. The liberals, who can't understand why
anyone would want to defend themselves or their property (I guess
too many years of living off the government tit has diluted their
sense of "self-worth"), have been trying for years and years to
turn the US into Canada or UK...where one can be completely
defenseless and only the government can have guns...to use on
whomever they please.
see? something seems backwards here... to me, liberal means allowing
more of something whereas a conservative wants to restrict something...
Actually... no...
Well, it depends on who is using the words and when. And about
what.
Conservative used to mean preserving the good parts of the
system. Now it means catering to business and big money.
Liberal used to mean change the system, more or less quickly and
drastically. Now it has been so distorted by right wing media no
one knows what it means at all.
Today conservatives want tax cuts for the rich, and shifting the
burden to the working class. That and interfering in your
personal life.
Liberals want to tax the rich, shift the burden to those who
have profited the most, and keep government out of your personal
life.
allowing personal gun ownership (ie: not trying to take it away) seems
to be a liberal act... like liberally applying mayonaise to a sandwich...
True.
who switched the terms' definitions around? why?
Mostly right wingers, to disguise the fact that they have
twisted things around completely.
A lot of it goes all the way back to the days of the
Revolution. Back then, you had the Whigs and Tories. The
Tories were the royalists who favored King George, and the
Whigs were the colonials and others who favored
independence and a republican form of government. After
the war, the Tories became known as Democrats, favoring a
more 'liberal' form of government where everyone was equal,
and the government acted on behalf of all the people, like
their 'mommy' so to speak.
Well, that has to be one of the most absurd possible
explanations. First of all, the Tories had nothing much to do
with the early US government. The Republicans were the ones who
adhered to the ideas of Thomas Jefferson who favored a farmer
rural small town nation.
The ones favoring a strong central government and industry were
the Federalists. There was no democratic party then.
The Whigs favored a republic and favored more individual
rights for citizens -- less intrusive government at the
top, and more state's rights at the bottom. The Whigs
The Whigs didn't exist until 45 years after the constitution was
signed. When they did come into existance they were the
replacement for the Federalists, the strong federal government
industrial nation party.
gradually faded out by the mid-1800s. There was a whole
During that period there were two republican parties. The
National Republican party who followed up on the
Whigs/Federalists, and the Democratic-Republican party who were
the original Republican party.
raft of small parties that cropped up and quickly died out
at the same time. Then in the 1850s, the Grand Old Party
(aka the Republicans) started up. After ten years of
After the Democratic-Republican party changed their name to the
Democratic party.
running locals at the state level, they entered national
politics and nominated Lincoln as their candidate for
president. The rest is history.
The old line pre-WWII Democrats were a lot more like modern
Republicans, and are often referred to as small L liberals.
Or conservatives.
Post war Democrats (or Roosevelt Democrats) are often
called big L liberals because of the more radical
Roosevelt ideology that fathered the welfare state, and
things like Social Security and Medicare (modern day
entitlement programs).
So, nobody has really switched the definitions. Think of
'liberal' in terms of being 'progressive' or 'community
oriented' where control is more centrally located, and
power is excercised supposedly for the benefit of all.
'Conservative' refers to decentralized control where power
is restricted and exercised to a set of rules laid down in
the Constitution, with much more individual autonomy.
That last part is not quite true. Conservative doesn't actually
mean adhering to the constitution. If you don't believe it, try
to explain how government can subsidize religious proselytizing
combined with welfare service. Conservative typically means
states rights, which has very little to do with restricting
power, just who wields is. Corruption is really more common in
local government than national. As is abuse.
That's my observation.
BOB KLAHN
bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn
... When you get there, there isn't any there anymore.
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
* Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)