• NPR is collateral damage...

    From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to SEAN DENNIS on Tue Mar 22 05:53:44 2011

    While I'm not involved with the Tea Party at all, I did
    find this article interesting...

    === Cut ===
    NPR Is Collateral Damage in Battle to Brand Tea Party

    Posted By Andrew Breitbart On March 11, 2011 @ 9:59 am

    This article first appeared at the Huffington Post [1].

    Since O'Keefe's video has been shown to be fraudulent, why is
    that even an issue?

    The latest James OÆKeefe success story [2] against NPR has
    taken a predictable pattern ù panicked press releases and
    firings, followed by denunciation of OÆKeefe in a belated
    attempt to discredit him. Naturally, conservatives are

    Esp since Glen Beck's people discredited O'Keefe definatively.

    ...

    as racist. Remember the protests on Capitol Hill last March
    against ObamaCare, and the mediaÆs lie that members of the
    Congressional Black Congress had awful racial slurs hurled
    at them by Tea Party members that weekend? Did you know
    that thereÆs video evidence that it isnÆt true?

    How is there evidence it isn't true?

    Remember the right wing mantra, "Lack of evidence is not
    evidence of lack."?

    ...

    But the mainstream media has allowed the lie to live on as
    one of the central ôproofsö of Tea Party racism. ItÆs been

    Only a true fool believes there is no racism at all in the Tea
    Party.

    The mainstream media promotes the idea that the Tea Party
    is racist because they want to delegitimize an authentic,
    grassroots movement that stands up to big government. And

    And that is a lie from the git-go. The Mainstream media says
    little about the Tea Party, but practically nothing negative.

    the ôTea Party N-wordö story ties all the other lies about
    the Tea Party togetherûthat itÆs violent, that itÆs
    extreme, that itÆs a ômob.ö If you want to see what a

    Which has not appeared in the MSM that I have seen at all.

    ...

    James OÆKeefeÆs NPR tapes show what conservatives already
    knew: that avowed radical religious extremist racists like
    the Muslim Brotherhood get better treatment from
    journalists than politically engaged Americans who believe
    in limited government. Jihadist high-rollers or the

    Glen Beck showed what progressives already knew, that right
    wingers would believe any lie that paints the opposition badly.

    ...

    guilty-until-proven-innocent Tea Party or people at town
    hall meetings.

    The Tea Partyiers were proven guilty at town hall meetings.

    But hereÆs the question that no one on the leftûexcept Jon
    Stewart [8]ûis asking about the NPR sting: why did NPR roll
    over so quickly? Why did they fire Ron Schiller that same
    day, and why did NPRÆs board fire Vivian Schiller the next?

    True. Why did they cave to O'keefe's fraud?

    Ron Schiller could have fought back. He could have
    emphasized that he was speaking in his personal capacity,
    and that he had no input into NPRÆs editorial process. But
    he didnÆt fight. Why not?

    Or, he could have argued that he did not say what he was accused
    of, and the O'Keefe faked up his videos. Which happens to be the
    truth.

    ...

    Maybe NPR knows thereÆs more to comeûthat OÆKeefe has more
    evidence of high-level collusion with the radical left.

    Turns out O'Keefe didn't even have what he posted.

    ...

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Freedom is more precious than peace.
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)