• WHY GAS PRICES ARE RE

    From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to JEFF BINKLEY on Sun Mar 13 04:19:50 2011

    ...

    Speaking of wild spending, I understand that we need to spend money
    on military matters in order to protect ourselves, and don't have
    much of an issue with that. But I was reading an article on CNet, CW>>where the pentagon was funding a robotics company to produce robotic CW>>cheetah prototypes. That seems a bit excessive even for the "future CW>>military" thing. I can think of about a hundred better ways to spend CW>>that money, half of which would probably protect our troops withount CW>>needing to go "Terminator" on them. *rolls eyes*

    If you're interested, there article is at CW>>http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20037213-1.html?part=rss&subj=new CW>>s&tag=254 7-1_3-0-20

    Typical guns and butter debate. Military spending equals
    less than 16% of the federal budget whereas entitlement
    spending is close to 40%. The bottom line is that the
    government is very inefficient and there is plenty of room
    for trimming and cutting.

    Entitlement is a vague term. The military includes veteran's
    benefits, medical care for the seriously wounded, and nuclear
    weapons research and maintenance, none of which are counted as
    part of the military budget.

    Guns and butter should not be a debate, we need both. Now poor
    nutrition and deprivation of educational opportunity are
    problems that affect the military. It all ties together in the
    long run.


    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... All taglines are currently busy. Please try again later.
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to CRYSTAL WALTERS on Sun Mar 13 20:22:12 2011



    Typical guns and butter debate. Military spending equals less
    than 16% of the federal budget whereas entitlement spending is
    close to 40%. The bottom line is that the government is very
    inefficient and there is plenty of room for trimming and
    cutting.

    Not sure I'm familiar with the term "entitlement soending", please CW>>elaborate.

    Entitlement spending. It is what the government spends for
    entitlement programs. I personally believe they are
    misnamed because who decides who does and doesn't deserve a
    government entitlement ? And why are the entitled to it ?

    Notice how his definition is circular. Entitlement spending is
    anything the right wingers don't like.

    It's a label they put on it to make it look like something that
    has to be cut, no matter how damaging to the economy or the
    nation, or the people.

    They really can't explain much about it. And the greatest sence
    of entitlement in this country is that held by the wealthy. The
    group JB believes is entitled to everything.


    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... It's bad when right wing Nazi comparisons become "Garden Variety".
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to CRYSTAL WALTERS on Sun Mar 13 20:23:42 2011



    ... People say I'm apathetic, but I don't care.

    Or maybe he agrees with his base ?

    Being one of those aforementioned environmentalists (not a very good CW>>one mind you, i'm kind of a hypocrite), judging from some of his CW>>mactions, I'm not entirely convinced that he does. I know the right CW>>likes to paint him a lefist idealist, but us on the far left can't CW>>stand the man. He breaks promises like any other career politician.

    Obama's real qualification was... the others were so much worse.

    But at the end of the day they will still pull the level
    for him in the voting booth.

    I never vote for any presidential candidate. I have, however,
    voted against a lot of them.

    Look at the list of current prospects. I don't see one of them
    any better. Not even as good.



    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Vultures only fly with carrion luggage.
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to ALL on Sun Mar 13 20:30:56 2011

    ...

    But at the end of the day they will still pull the level for him in the
    voting booth.

    My mother, while nominally a Republican, has always been
    proud of the fact that she votes for the man, not the
    party. I reminded her that no matter how good the man
    might be, if he's a Democrat he does what the party tells
    him to do, or gets thrown under the bus because its their
    way or the highway.

    It's not nice to mislead your mother. Notice how the Blue Dog
    democrats did *NOT* do what the party wanted, and they not only
    did not get thrown under the bus, but got advantages?

    Notice how the republicans who did not do what the party wanted
    got thrown under the bus? I said before the election that the
    Tea Party would be responsible for more repubican defeats than
    the democrats would. So the Tea Party not only nominated whack
    job candidates that could not get elected, but also ran
    candidates who beat out real republicans.

    The Blue Dog Democrats, the ones who were more independent, got
    hit bad by the Tea Party, as did conservative democrats in
    general.

    Yet the democratic party supported even the Blue Dog democrats,
    while the republican party demanded toe the line lock step to
    get support.

    I don't think she ever thought about
    it like that before. Never too late to learn something,
    even at 81.

    Even if it's false?

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... This is too much like reality for me.
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to CRYSTAL WATERS on Sun Mar 13 20:32:42 2011

    ...

    My mother, while nominally a Republican, has always been proud of the JH>>fact that she votes for the man, not the party. I reminded her that
    no matter how good the man might be, if he's a Democrat he does what JH>>the party tells him to do, or gets thrown under the bus because its JH>>their way or the highway. I don't think she ever thought about it
    like that before. Never too late to learn something, even at 81.

    Well done. It is by no accident that the Democrat Party
    has been labeled a Herd.

    Only by right wingers to whom anything not on their agenda is
    some kinda herd directive.

    If the republicans had any level of independence at all *SOME*
    republicans would have voted for Obamacare. After all, it is
    just a national version of Romneycare.



    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Never use a big word where a diminutive one will suffice.
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Since 1991 And Were Still Here! DOCSPLACE.TZO.COM (1:123/140)