1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. ARTWARE

  • [timEd] TZUTC kludge

    From Martin Foster@2:280/464.27 to All on Tue Apr 19 11:15:26 2022
    Hello All!

    Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in the message header?

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- timEd/Linux 1.31.g3+
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:280/464.27)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Martin Foster on Tue Apr 19 12:59:14 2022
    Hi Martin,

    On 2022-04-19 11:15:26, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
    @CHRS: IBMPC 2
    @TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
    Hello All!

    Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in the message header?

    I don't see one...

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- timEd/Linux 1.31.g3+
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:280/464.27)
    SEEN-BY: 124/5016 153/757 154/10 203/0 221/0 280/464 5003 292/8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250
    @PATH: 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Martin Foster@2:280/464.27 to Wilfred van Velzen on Wed Apr 20 11:58:45 2022
    Hello Wilfred!

    *** Tuesday 19.04.22 at 10:59:14, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Martin Foster:

    @MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
    @CHRS: IBMPC 2
    @TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
    Hello All!

    Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in the
    message header?

    I don't see one...

    Thanks for the confirmation.

    Anyone have a fix for this?

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- WinPoint 407.0
    * Origin: WinPoint Test Rig - UK - (2:280/464.27)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Martin Foster on Wed Apr 20 13:49:11 2022
    Hi Martin,

    On 2022-04-20 11:58:45, you wrote to me:

    @MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
    @CHRS: IBMPC 2
    @TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71

    Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in
    the message header?

    I don't see one...

    Thanks for the confirmation.

    Anyone have a fix for this?

    Use GoldED!? ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Martin Foster@2:280/464.27 to Wilfred van Velzen on Wed Apr 20 13:47:09 2022
    Hello Wilfred!

    *** Wednesday 20.04.22 at 11:49:11, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Martin Foster:

    @MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
    @CHRS: IBMPC 2
    @TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71

    Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in
    the message header?

    I don't see one...

    Thanks for the confirmation.

    Anyone have a fix for this?

    Use GoldED!? ;)

    HaHaHa 8-))

    According to what I've just read a few minutes ago in another echo, it seems that kludges are not actually required - Hmmmm.

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- WinPoint 407.0
    * Origin: WinPoint Test Rig - UK - (2:280/464.27)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Martin Foster on Wed Apr 20 15:40:35 2022
    Hi Martin,

    On 2022-04-20 13:47:09, you wrote to me:

    Anyone have a fix for this?

    Use GoldED!? ;)

    HaHaHa 8-))

    According to what I've just read a few minutes ago in another echo, it seems that kludges are not actually required - Hmmmm.

    That's the standard answer from people that don't support (all of) them. ;-)

    Michiel gave the full answer... (Plus MSGID's can make dupe detection more reliable and faster)

    I think it's polite towards your fellow sysops, who use them, to have the minimum set (as mentioned by Michiel).

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)