This was originally in POL-DISORDER.....note the date:

On 01-25-09, EARL CROASMUN said to ALL:

Bob Klahn has decided that he will no longer participate in this echo. EC>Given the number of times that his shallow thinking, dishonesty, and EC>childishness have been exposed here, perhaps he made the right decision.

But instead of preserving some sense of honor and integrity by simply EC>leaving, he has chosen the cowardly approach of intentionally and EC>repeatedly violating the rules and getting himself banned. This will EC>allow him to pretend that he was a martyr who was persecuted. Wilson may EC>even buy that line, but no one else will.

Regulars will notice that this is an old Klahn standard strategy. He EC>doesn't accept responsibility for his own actions. He likes to pretend EC>that his actions are "forced" upon him. You may remember his old line EC>that he NEVER WANTS to flame anyone, but sometimes they FORCE him to flame EC>them. In his mind, Bob sees himself as easily pushed around, easily EC>bullied, and easily forced to do things that he doesn't want to do. There EC>are clear childhood issues there.

Klahn wants to be banned. Klahn is now banned from this echo. Everyone EC>else here is free to discuss him and to respond in this echo to posts he EC>makes in the DEBATE echo or any other echo, as long as your comments EC>follow the rules of the echo: no threats and no actionable defamation. He EC>has several available avenues of response to what you say here, including EC>his own echo.

On 1/24/2009 10:58 AM, bob klahn wrote to EARL CROASMUN:

Take a two week vacation from the echo. Over the last
several months you have violated the rules of your echo
repeatedly. And now you have hypocritically acted against
Otto for using the word "lie" in a post, even though you
have done the same here. It is sad that you cannot follow
your own rules, but you had ample warnings. Feel free to
use CROSSFIRE, MATZDOBRE, or DEBATE to continue your end of
threads, but do not post in this echo prior to Feb. 7.

Because of your absurd insistance on trying to enforce my echo
rules in your echo against me I had to write a rule in my echo
against echo sabatoge.

This is going to be difficult, because you have just committed
echo sabatoge.

He "had to." It is "difficult." Classic victimology. Poor Bob! He EC>thinks that FOLLOWING the rules of his echo somehow SABOTAGES his echo! EC>All he had to do was follow his own rules, and he just COULD NOT DO IT!

You are banned from the Debate echo until you abandon this
blatant attempt to sabatoge my echo.

Oh no! Not that! Will he also ban me from MENSA, where he sits and talks EC>to himself?

---
*Durango b301 #PE*
* Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

On 01-29-09, BOB KLAHN said to EARL CROASMUN:

Bob Klahn has decided that he will no longer participate in

Not true. Earl decided he needed an excuse to force me out
without looking too awfully obvious.

Earl's lies deleted.

But instead of preserving some sense of honor and integrity
by simply leaving, he has chosen the cowardly approach of
intentionally and repeatedly violating the rules and
getting himself banned.

Another lie by Earl. I left his echo once before, and would do
it again. The last time I left it the echo died for quite a
while.

Notice that Earl went so far as to create rules that applied
only to me. That is all the proof you need.

This will allow him to pretend
that he was a martyr who was persecuted. Wilson may even
buy that line, but no one else will.

Just a Christian who refuses to be thrown to the pagans.

Klahn wants to be banned.

Another lie by Earl. What I want is for Earl to start acting
like a decent human being. Apparently that's enough to get
banned from Earl's echo.

echo. Everyone else here is free to discuss him and to
respond in this echo to posts he makes in the DEBATE echo
or any other echo, as long as your comments follow the
rules of the echo: no threats and no actionable defamation.

Yet Hardegree made threats, with no reprecussions. More evidence
it was Earl's desire to force me out.

As to actionable defamation, Earl should take a copy of his echo
for the last couple days and show it to his lawyer.

He has several available avenues of response to what you
say here, including his own echo.

Another lie by Earl, but this one proves what I said. There is
no way I could respond to anything in Pol disorder in my echo
without violating the rules of my echo. Which would lead to the BK>destruction of my echo. And that is how Earl intends to sabatoge
my echo.

__________________________________________________________

Unfortunately for him, I found another way. This way. __________________________________________________________

He means `hijack' your echo.

---
*Durango b301 #PE*
* Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

This was originally in POL-DISORDER.....

Yes, but I am not sure how it wound up in an echo named ARGUS.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

Re: RE: Moderator Action

This was originally in POL-DISORDER.....

Yes, but I am not sure how it wound up in an echo named ARGUS.

I can, can't you see how similar the echo tags are?? ;-)

Eric Hutchins, K7ELH

Midnight Express BBS * midxpres.net * VQNet * STNNet * FidoNet

--- Virtual Advanced Ver 2 for DOS
* Origin: Midnight Express BBS (1:218/150)