Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 64:31:52 |
| Calls: | 12 |
| Files: | 12,938 |
| Messages: | 99,119 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
You're absolutely full of shit, Nick. If you want to protect your "great leader" in FIDONEWS, be my guest. But stop trying to heat things up here. don't want to read about your and Bjorn's ideas of how everything should b free for the asking - HERE, I want to hear about Argus. And nothing else.
I'm hubbing for R10 on Radius - hope that counts... :)
Oddly enough, I just saw a connection to you a bit ago. It looks like all
of your domains for every network you're in are @fidonet, except Agoranet.
I asked Robert to stop his off-topic attacks, to be fair
we should take this discussion somewhere else.
YOU wrote this, despite the lousy quoting.
No Robert. Kurt Weiske wrote that. Follow along, please.
You're absolutely full of shit, Nick. If you want to protect your
"great leader" in FIDONEWS, be my guest. But stop trying to heat
things up here. don't want to read about your and Bjorn's ideas of
how everything should b free for the asking - HERE, I want to hear
about Argus. And nothing else.
So everyone that disagrees with you, or dislikes the way you talk to
people is a follower of Bjorn?
[EOT]
In case you didn't see it the first time..
[EOT]
I asked Robert to stop his off-topic attacks, to be fair KW>>> we should take this discussion somewhere else.
No Robert. Kurt Weiske wrote that. Follow along, please.
If you could quote decently, I'd be glad to. I changed nothing above, and anyone's guess who really wrote the lines. Are we supposed to guess?
Nicki, you should finally get yourself a decent mail editor.
So everyone that disagrees with you, or dislikes the way you talk to people is a follower of Bjorn?
A "worshipper", Nicki, not a "follower".
In case you didn't see it the first time..
So why do you ignore it yourself?
It seems every once in awhile you need to be let know that you're
going off the deep end. Whether you actually realize it at some point
or not, is completely up to you, though.
I asked Robert to stop his off-topic attacks, to be fair KW>>> we should take this discussion somewhere else.
No Robert. Kurt Weiske wrote that. Follow along, please.
If you could quote decently, I'd be glad to. I changed nothing
above, and
anyone's guess who really wrote the lines. Are we supposed to guess?
Nicki, you should finally get yourself a decent mail editor.
Bob. If you would have followed the thread you would have realized
it's Kurt that is using Synchronet. Everything is properly quoted
here,
since I'm using a different BBS software to post messages, and
have been since I originally told you I was working on another
setup.
So, if it was yet another reason to attack someone that you decided
to bring this old news up, you might as well quit while you're
already behind.
Just an FYI, FIDONEWS is being completely ignored at the moment.
if it is properly quoted, why does it keep adding new quote initials and > signs instead of just adding another '>' to the existing already quoted qu but this is something for the mystic echo...
so you changed from synchronet? why? that is what you were recently runnin wasn't it?
why does everything have to be an attack? this message is definitely not a attack on you or your chosen software...
FWIW: i'm still waiting on rob swindell to explain why synchronet is gener MSGID lines for posts that do not contain such... he quite conviently left quit or just STFU when i posted the proof to him using one of his own mess with one of your's being the first i spotted doing such ;)
Just an FYI, FIDONEWS is being completely ignored at the moment.
Only certain members there. After some netmail moderation... :)
if it is properly quoted, why does it keep adding new quote initials
and > signs instead of just adding another '>' to the existing
and > already quoted qu but this is something for the mystic echo...
Why does most everyone's do the same?
I do remember him saying there was an RC change in his region, so his
uplink might have lost some messages, and by the time he got back, a few of his replies never made it to you, so he just gave up on the unwinnable battle.
if it is properly quoted, why does it keep adding new quote
initials and >
signs instead of just adding another '>' to the existing already
quoted qu
but this is something for the mystic echo...
Why does most everyone's do the same?
And is this another "proposition?" Or is it an actual standard?
so you changed from synchronet? why? that is what you were
recently runnin
wasn't it?
I'm still running Synchronet, but I'm posting messages from my
Mystic point system,
which is under a major 'overhaul from default' right now. :)
FWIW: i'm still waiting on rob swindell to explain why synchronet
is gener
MSGID lines for posts that do not contain such... he quite
conviently left
quit or just STFU when i posted the proof to him using one of his
own mess
with one of your's being the first i spotted doing such ;)
I don't know. You'll have to take it up with him. Maybe he's just
ignoring your anal retentivity? Everyone's software has flaws. Some
more than others. Your software is broken too, Mark. He did point
that out before he stopped posting.
I do remember him saying there was an RC change in his region, so
his uplink might have lost some messages, and by the time he got
back, a few of his replies never made it to you, so he just gave up
on the unwinnable battle.
I do remember him saying there was an RC change in his region, so his
uplink might have lost some messages, and by the time he got back,
a few of his replies never made it to you, so he just gave up on the unwinnable battle.
That RC/uplink is me. If you're seeing my posts, chances are you're
seeing Rob's, too. :)
That RC/uplink is me. If you're seeing my posts, chances are you're seeing Rob's, too. :)
Why does most everyone's do the same?
do what? multiple quotes like this
OR like this?
mn> ij> ef> ab> ab wrote this 4 quotes back
mn> ij> ef> ef wrote this 3 quotes back
mn> ij> ij wrote this 2 quotes back
mn> mn wrote this 1 quote back
each of the above three use the same formatting rules... but if one doesn' allow for the space between the quote prefixes, it may not recognize it as previous quoted quote and would then stuff its own quote prefix onto the line... then you get things like what your quoter has been seen to do...
but the simple answer to your question is that they do the simple quoting quote chopping at the end of the line because their coder couldn't or didn won't figure out how to do it properly... in other words, some might use t term "lazy"... others, codes possibly, might say, "hey, at least they can quote. if they want better, they can write it themselves or pay for better
yes, mine does have some problems... but i can't fix mine like he can in t software that he maintains... the source code to all the various packages has not been released and likely never will be... i know that in one case, there was $10000US spent for the sources but i doubt that it has brought i 1/3rd of that since it was bought and updated...
he specifically posted some of the messages that didn't make it out originally... but an RC change shouldn't frak things like that up... RC addresses are just additional addresses and should not be used in the processing of regular echomail and netmail... if a system is moving mail, can continue to do it without and breakage if they use their normal node address... sadly, though, this conversation has come up more than once ove years, too... sadly^2 some folk still don't listen to history and so they up with problems like you described when an RC was apparently hubbing mail had to switch things out when another person took over the RC slot...
Why does most everyone's do the same?
do what? multiple quotes like this
OR like this?
mn> ij> ef> ab> ab wrote this 4 quotes back
mn> ij> ef> ef wrote this 3 quotes back
mn> ij> ij wrote this 2 quotes back
mn> mn wrote this 1 quote back
Looks like Mystic does it this way.
With all the different ways editors do it, which way is the
correct way?
And is that correct way fact or opinion?
each of the above three use the same formatting rules... but if
one doesn'
allow for the space between the quote prefixes, it may not
recognize it as
previous quoted quote and would then stuff its own quote prefix onto the line... then you get things like what your quoter has been seen to do...
What things did my quoter do? I'm pretty sure it keeps what's
there, and adds it's own quote prefix.
Whereas with synchronet, mine was stripping quote prefixes.
Now you're saying both of them are wrong? I just can't win, can I?
:)
but the simple answer to your question is that they do the simple
quoting
quote chopping at the end of the line because their coder couldn't
or didn
won't figure out how to do it properly... in other words, some
might use t
term "lazy"... others, codes possibly, might say, "hey, at least
they can
quote. if they want better, they can write it themselves or pay
for better
I've been requesting this be changed with Mystic. I prefer word
wrapping, rather than chopping off the end of a line.
It's not that bad on one quote,
because I think it only chops 4 chars off the end,
but if you have 4 quote prefixes, I'm willing to bet you're
getting 16 chars chopped, which isn't cool at all.
yes, mine does have some problems... but i can't fix mine like he
can in t
software that he maintains... the source code to all the various
packages
has not been released and likely never will be... i know that in
one case,
there was $10000US spent for the sources but i doubt that it has
brought i
1/3rd of that since it was bought and updated...
You can fix them by switching softwares. But you wouldn't do that,
would you?
It's not THAT important.. right? I have a feeling that
devs that see crappy wording in proposals, follow them how they
want to follow them. At least that's what I got out of your
previous discussion with Rob.
he specifically posted some of the messages that didn't make it out originally... but an RC change shouldn't frak things like that up... RC addresses are just additional addresses and should not be used in the processing of regular echomail and netmail... if a system is
moving mail,
can continue to do it without and breakage if they use their normal node address... sadly, though, this conversation has come up more than
once ove
years, too... sadly^2 some folk still don't listen to history and
so they
up with problems like you described when an RC was apparently
hubbing mail
had to switch things out when another person took over the RC slot...
I don't think that was the situation. I think Rob had to switch his
link to a new person completely.